cross-posted from: https://ponder.cat/post/2330924

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at “protecting” American energy from “state overreach.” The move, some energy experts say, is a legally dubious federal overstep designed to undermine the rights of states and local authorities to combat climate change.

The order claims “many States have enacted, or are in the process of enacting, burdensome and ideologically motivated ‘climate change’ or energy policies that threaten American energy dominance and our economic and national security.”

It specifically points to Blue-state policies like Vermont’s Superfund rules, which require fossil fuel companies to pay for damage to the climate, and California’s cap-and-trade program as examples of efforts to “dictate national energy policy.” In Section 2 of the order, Trump directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to identify state laws or policies “burdening” access to “domestic energy resources that “are or may be…unconstitutional, preempted by Federal law, or otherwise unenforceable.”

What might some of those state laws be? According to the executive order, that could include any effort to address “climate change,” support “environmental justice,” or reduce “greenhouse gas” emissions, among others.

That’s not the end of it. The order also directs the attorney general to “expeditiously” take action to “stop the enforcement of State laws and continuation of civil actions” determined to be illegal.

It’s unclear whether this will stand up in court. Michael Gerrard, the faculty director of Columbia University’s Sabin Center for Climate Change Law, told E&E News that the executive order is “toothless” and that Trump “has no authority on his own to nullify state laws.” Journalist David Roberts, who runs the clean energy newsletter Volts called the order on Bluesky, “wildly, unambiguously unconstitutional” and “dictator shit.”

Others on social media noted the president’s contradiction of traditionally conservative values. As climate reporter and Drilled podcast host Amy Westervelt put it on Bluesky, “States rights! But only when the states agree with us[.]”Climate scientist and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) contributing author Zeke Hausfather posted, “So much for federalism…” And Tulane environmental studies professor Joshua Basseches wrote, “Federal overreach has historically been a crusade of the Right, but these times are wild and different.”

This new White House executive order says that the US Attorney General is going to prevent states from implementing democratically passed laws regarding climate change and clean energy. It scarcely needs stating at this point that this is wildly, unambiguously unconstitutional. Dictator shit.

David Roberts (@volts.wtf) 2025-04-09T05:42:55.516Z

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago
    • Climate change isn’t real
    • Climate change is real, but man isn’t contributing to it.
    • Man is contributing to it, but it’s too late to do anything about it.
    • Don’t try to do anything about it or we will fuck you up <- We are here. How the fuck did we get here?
  • PunnyName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    4 days ago

    Just gonna keep posting this:

    “It’s vile.”
    They want it that way.

    “It’s inhumane.”
    They want it that way.

    “It’s dangerous.”
    They want it that way.

    “It’s criminal.”
    They want it that way.

    “It’s illegal.”
    They want it that way.

    The current administration is doing all the evil because…they want it that way.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    4 days ago

    I know they want us to get violent. But it still feels like we should be. Catch22 or whatever, the real move was to not elect him.

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 days ago

    So when are some of the states going to stand up and say that executive orders have no legal force, and Trump can pound sand?

    • floofloofOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s the same here in Canada: conservatives originated this kind of policy but if anyone else does it they’re suddenly completely against it. Never trust a conservative, I guess.

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      He’s a narcissist. A true, clinical narcissist with NPD, not just a selfish fuck with narcissistic tendancies as most Americans have been indoctrinated/propagandized/miseducated/deluded to be so as to be optimal consumers.

      As such, he truly believes the world, all of humanity, and the entirety of all existence only ever mattered as a function of bringing him, Donald Trump, into being and facilitating his divine grandeur, and can’t ever matter again once he’s gone.

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 days ago

      that’s what the christofascists like about him. they’re trying to trigger the end times so they can be raptured. unfortunately they fail to recognize which faction they are in revelations. they’re not the true christian church, but rather the followers of the antichrist

      • el_muerte@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        It kind of astounds me that’s these people think an omnipotent and omniscient deity, capable of speaking the universe into existence, needs their help to bring about his plans for Armageddon. Like, God is gonna be foiled if America stops unconditionally supporting Israel or something.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        evangelicals are so obssesed with the rapture yet they are not doing anything that warrant anything to be raptured, aka ascension. the end of time would be when “angels” start appearing over tokyo.

    • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      just look at this map

      if for example the us were to control greenland and canada (like krasnov is saber rattling over), we’d just see russia (on the south) and the us (on the south) along most of the arctic ocean (the disputed zone). ocean temperatures rise, the arctic thaws, and the us (a vassal state of russia under krasnov) and russia control all of the trade.
      it is not a pretty picture