Summary

The National Park Service removed Harriet Tubman’s image and quote from its “Underground Railroad” webpage, along with references to slavery and the Fugitive Slave Act.

The revision now emphasizes “American ideals of liberty” and downplays historical realities.

Historians and scholars condemned the move as a distortion of history and erasure of Tubman’s legacy.

The change aligns with broader Trump administration efforts to eliminate DEI content across federal sites, which critics say suppresses discussions of race, identity, and historical truth.

    • whoisearth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      One of my more fun conspiracies is that we have been going through this cycle for eons. There’s no previous record of this beyond myths of giants and angels because eventually society gets so advanced permeant records of its existence cease. Everything is digital. It can be erased with the bat of an eye. This is why all we can find is carvings from the beginning of our iteration with memories from people as to what existed before the crash and then it gets lost. We look at it as myths but maybe they weren’t. Maybe they were more advanced than us and pushed back to the stone age.

  • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    167
    ·
    3 days ago

    what the fuck are they going to ultimately say the underground railroad was? What will they say it was helping who escape? THIS WHOLE THING IS STUPID!

  • Infynis@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    3 days ago

    This, and all the other sites they’ve taken down, are meant to be freely accessible to everyone. This is what your taxes actually pay for. The government runs a massive research operation, and library, for everyone. This is a book burning.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Eliminate DEI content” actually means “government-sponsored open bigotry”.

      • BlemboTheThird
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        If by “this,” you mean the reference towards Tubman, then you’re wrong. Talking about the accomplishments of anyone who isn’t a straight white Christian man IS promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion! DEI is a good thing! Opposing it is explicitly racist!

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It’s genuinely challenging trying to perceive what level of sarcasm you’re on, as a non-American and not hearing the tone of your voice.

          edit my bad I read that poorly, brain fart

          • BlemboTheThird
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 days ago

            Literally none. DEI straight up means treating everyone the same. They’re working on giving it some fucked up negative connotations the same way they have with “woke” and “critical race theory,” but if you look at the history and reality of where those words come from and what they mean, it becomes clear they’re playing with language, trying to avoid looking racist to the general public while still implementing racist policy.

            • Dasus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah sorry I read that as a negative on some level.

              Like my brain made an “isn’t” an “is” or skipped a “not”.

              That’s why I asked. Thought someone was being like “but won’t someone please think of the straight white men” and then I thought well obviously that must be sarcasm but then the general tone didn’t seem as sarcastic…

              The large bowl of weed I smoked and listening to 8 out of 10 cats while browsing may have contribute to me making that mistake.

              My bad.

              Here, let me contribute by actually promoting content relating to history and especially history of black women in the US.

              The Six Triple Eight

              I loved that movie. I don’t know why but empowerment of minorities and the vindication that they get in movies like that gets me really emotional, especially after a few rums.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Yeah, about your pamphlet…I’m not seeing anything about German history between 1939 and 1945.”

    “Everyone was on vacation.”

    “What are you talking about, Germany invaded Poland in 1939.”

    “We were invited! Punch was served. Check with Poland!”

    “You can’t just ignore those years! Thomas Mann fled to America because of Nazism’s stranglehold on Germany!”

    “Nope…He left to manage a Dairy Queen!”

    “A Dairy Queen? That’s preposterous!”

    “I will hear NO MORE insinuations about the German people. NOTHING BAD HAPPENED!”

  • Rob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    3 days ago

    New quote:

    “Immigrants mysteriously disappeared from their jobs in the South and reappeared in the North. No women were involved in this process.”

    • Darkard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      3 days ago

      All of the workers in the south worked really hard for their boss and earned a promotion and moved into luxury in the north. All of these people were hardworking Americans and none of them were black

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      And provide some hope? Nah, if they are erasing history then they will just say “No slave ever successfully escaped. They were required by law to be returned if found and the North didn’t follow the law. The North, those law breakers, were trying to pick a fight for decades. The Noble South was attacked and lost their righteous cause due to brotherly betrayal.”

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is about flexing their power. They are showing that they won and they are going to force their values down everyone else’s throat.

      Don’t belittle them by calling them pathetic. Call it what it is.

      This is fascism.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        Fascism is pathetic. It’s extremely dangerous and causes massive suffering, but it’s also pathetic.

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        the fascists want to be acary and hate being called pathetic because it means we’re not scared of them. the fascists are pathetic

    • ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, well what’s the end game here …that white USAians never did anything bad, or that African Americans never did anything?

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh, ok, so now Civilization VII is more historically accurate than the National Park Service. That’s… ugh

  • mapmyhike@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    In other news, Harriet Tubman has been collecting social security for 200 years and her remains have been deported back to her own country of El Salvador.