Six months ago staunch allies like Canada and Australia would have loved to help, although they couldn’t replace China overnight. But the same tariffs that led to China’s new licenses for critical minerals are hitting the former allies Trump is treating like enemies.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Autarky sounds fine to first order thinkers, who don’t ask themselves things like “where is a nation supposed to get resources it doesn’t have naturally”

      • Lyrl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        Military conquest. That line of thinking was a big driver for Germany and Japan in WWII. Scary to see that path opening as a possible future.

  • Grizzlyboy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    America is the cyclist that sticks a branch into the wheel. No fucking way you’re being fucked after burning all bridges.

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      A man came up to him crying. Big guy crying. He had never seen someone shoot both their own feet. But he did it, bone spurs and all.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        He said to him ‘‘Sir’’ they always call him ‘sir’ he’s so respected. They said ‘‘Sir, thank GOD, and JESUS, you are president’’ and he wheeled himself out with only one shot foot. They know I’m better than that!

      • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Every time. They’re well aware of my stance on war.

        To go to war, every adult must vote yes or no. The yes vote is immediately signed up for military service, no exceptions given outside of life-threatening conditions. Everyone can do something even if it’s just logistics.

        No votes go about their business as usual.

        And of course, there will be people who for one reason or another, legitimate or not, can’t leave the general areas they live in. They can be national guard and show up to work the fields every day, ensuring wartime food supplies.

        It may sound harsh, but unless you’re willing to get down in the shit yourself, you have no business demanding someone else do it for you.

          • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            Ooh, yeah this is also a good one.

            Any politician that speaks in favor of going to war is given front-line duty regardless of how they vote.

            Again, if you’re going to demand it, you’re going to DO it. That means people who use their influence to sway others are also going to do it, even if they’re cowards behind a voting booth.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Nah, Rome tried that in the Republic, mostly it just got armies murdered. Rome won in the end anyways because what it was good at was making more armies.

            What you do is make the drafting of their children as enlisted front line mandatory.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    i’m all for it if it means the us will have lesser firepower to bomb us.

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    the japanese did their pearl harbor bombing as a response to oil embargos placed upon them by the united states and its allies; i wonder if the united states is going to do its own pearl harbor.

    • fake_meows@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      One of the ways that people now interpret WW2 was that armored tanks , ships and planes became critical in combat, and every actor in the conflict was going out and trying to secure oil supply lines. Places like Europe, Africa, the middle east and the pacific were all involved due to reliance on fossil fuel resources… Whoever could capture the resources or secure the flow of the supply lines had huge advantages. You could bring down the enemy by indirectly starving them of oil just as quickly as attacking them head on. The allied forces directly targeted the axis oil infrastructure like refineries as their highest priority targets.

      https://oilprice.com/Energy/Crude-Oil/How-Oil-Defeated-The-Nazis.html

      Surely that can’t be happening again with new types of critical resources?