• Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    “In the environment you just described”

    So wheres the rest of the prompt then?

    Why the fuck do we keep acting like this shit is content worth interacting with?

  • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    ai doesn’t believe that whats happening right now in reality is actually real unless it has a search function

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It will if you define it properly - you have to scope the interaction properly though - the models are fine tuned to be the expert in the interaction and assist the user, they won’t take the users word as truth unless you break the dynamic or present part of the input as if it came from someone else

      • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I copy & pasted news articles as my source, the ai insisted on it being a really well detailed hypothesis but in the end still ‘unrealistic’