• ILikeBoobies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If Windows doesn’t work on that, then it’s not for the masses

    • Alaknár@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Sure, mate. 128 GB of RAM is clearly “for the masses”. :D

      To quote the classic: “the best thing about Linux is the community. The worst thing about Linux is the community”.

      • ILikeBoobies
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Did you even read what I said?

        If Windows needs more than 128gb of ram then it’s not for the masses because the masses have less than that

        • Alaknár@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          What are you trying to argue here, mate?

          We’re talking about OSes for the average user. You said that Windows with 128 GB is “not stable and not ready out of the box, unlike Linux”.

          Then you said “if it doesn’t work on that, then it’s not for the masses”.

          So what exactly is your point?