Hellfire103 to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoIt's that simpleimagemessage-square277fedilinkarrow-up11.64Karrow-down143
arrow-up11.59Karrow-down1imageIt's that simpleHellfire103 to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square277fedilink
minus-squareILikeBoobieslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·17 hours agoIf Windows doesn’t work on that, then it’s not for the masses
minus-squareAlaknár@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·17 hours agoSure, mate. 128 GB of RAM is clearly “for the masses”. :D To quote the classic: “the best thing about Linux is the community. The worst thing about Linux is the community”.
minus-squareILikeBoobieslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·17 hours agoDid you even read what I said? If Windows needs more than 128gb of ram then it’s not for the masses because the masses have less than that
minus-squareAlaknár@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·16 hours agoWhat are you trying to argue here, mate? We’re talking about OSes for the average user. You said that Windows with 128 GB is “not stable and not ready out of the box, unlike Linux”. Then you said “if it doesn’t work on that, then it’s not for the masses”. So what exactly is your point?
If Windows doesn’t work on that, then it’s not for the masses
Sure, mate. 128 GB of RAM is clearly “for the masses”. :D
To quote the classic: “the best thing about Linux is the community. The worst thing about Linux is the community”.
Did you even read what I said?
If Windows needs more than 128gb of ram then it’s not for the masses because the masses have less than that
What are you trying to argue here, mate?
We’re talking about OSes for the average user. You said that Windows with 128 GB is “not stable and not ready out of the box, unlike Linux”.
Then you said “if it doesn’t work on that, then it’s not for the masses”.
So what exactly is your point?
You just said it
Are you OK, buddy?