• Dum@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Non native speaker here.

    “Much” refers to something not countable, like “much more milk”, and is used without plural, “liter” is countable such that you could say “many more liters of milk” (note the plural of liter). So while I’d say the latter is more correct according to grammatical rules, if both are common, both can be considered correct, as rules are often rewritten to adapt to the way the English language is used.

    • ABoxOfNeurons@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      FWIW, as a native speaker, “much more images” is incorrect enough that seeing it would tell me that the author’s first language isn’t English.

      Having complex and arbitrary grammatical rules solely to telegraph education sucks though, so vive la revolution.

      • Crul@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for the confirmation!

        Do you know what could be the explanation for google showing more results with “many more images”?

        • ABoxOfNeurons@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Root cause? The complexity of English makes it an absurd choice for a worldwide standard.

          • rbesfe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Every language is complex, wtf are you smoking? If anything I’d say English is the best choice for a global standard because of how adaptible it is and the fact that it’s already the global common language for a bunch of industries. Reversing that will be challenging if not impossible

    • Crul@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That was my reasoning, which is correct in my native language (Spanish: "muchas más imágenes). That’s why seeing more results for “much more images” suprised me.

  • tychosmoose@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Native speaker here. I agree with the others that “many” is correct.

    Also, I only get 43 results for your first search, and 3,100,000 for the second.

    • Crul@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks!

      I only get 43 results for your first search,

      My bad, I didn’t mean there were a lot of results using both in the same document. I also get very few results for hat search.

      • tychosmoose@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        No, I mean I got 43 results on a Google search for the first quoted phrase, and 3.1M for the second quoted phrase. That’s two separate G searches. I was not looking for documents with both phrases.

        • Crul@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Definitively Google numbers are nonsense, now I see 1.1M

          • tychosmoose@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Definitely bs. I got 1.1 on first visit too. Then I refreshed the page and it was 42.