Linked National Post on purpose. Given their bias I believe they’d present the worst case scenario.

E: Apparently the article is from 2016 so the cost is likely higher today.

  • RaskolnikovsAxe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    32 minutes ago

    Why bother paying anything? Let it go to court. Threatening annexation should fall under some kind of hostilities clause, national security clause, or force majeure clause. Anyway who’s going to collect?

    The US government can pay MD, they’re the ones who threatened annexation.

  • CircaV
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 hours ago

    We need to pull out of this deal, the last thing Canada needs is to buy weapons from the country that has designs to annex us. And that sells weapons with kill switches.

      • CircaV
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        Exactly. Absolutely it has to be cancelled based on the fact that the imminent danger to Canada is from the US. No way we should be buying their weapons, listening to their media etc.

  • Global_Liberty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Of course Canada needs to leave. Do Canadian politicians think the US will supply it with parts as it invades?

    Buy some Gripen and/or Eurofighters and join GCAP.

  • Jerkface (any/all)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    That’s less than the total incurred costs of Ford’s decision to break the contract with The Beer Store a year earlier than scheduled.

      • crabigno@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        52 minutes ago

        And investment. 1/5 of my lifetime economies are now in European aerospace and military companies shares. Something I would have never thought I would do, as a fundamentally anti militaristic person. I don’t even care if I don’t get any economic benefits out of it.

  • Grimpen
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’ve been advocating joining GCAP, an effort by Japan, UK and Italy to make a 6th gen fighter. It isn’t scheduled to deliver the final design until 2035 though, so we would still need a stopgap.

    Still, it would send a pretty strong signal and also allow as a path to reinvigorate our domestic aerospace defence industry.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    America is currently at war with us, declared abruptly and out of nowhere. They just decided one day “we want to annex Canada!”

    Even if Donald’s presidency is short-lived and a new slightly saner and less stupid administration takes control, I don’t think it’s a good idea to be trusting the Americans any more.

    We need to disentangle ourselves from any military dependence on such ridiculously unreliable “allies.” I’m all for this.

    • pretzelz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You would imagine there would be a clause in the contract for exactly this scenario. If there’s not, it’s going to be a common one in contacts going forward…

    • PenguinMage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      As an American I sadly agree. This is an overreach that shouldn’t be ignored. And if it is OK now it’s obviously not off the table sometime down the road… this isnt something g you just shove under the carpet.

    • CircaV
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Exactly. Canada should just choose to ignore it. Just like the US is ignoring international deals they’ve signed with other countries. Thing is: Canada has honour and our actual signature means something when we sign agreements. I don’t think Canada will sink as low as the US.

    • Perhapsjustsniffit
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      14 hours ago

      When the creditor calls tell them Canada doesn’t live here anymore and hang up like your room mate used to do for you in college.

    • Yoga
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      “Canada’s liability would be no greater than US$346.7 million” – the difference between what it had already contributed and what was remaining of the original US$551 million commitment.

      Since the analysis was produced, the Liberal government has paid another US$33 million.

      Considering that there are Canadian companies that have contracts related to the f35 and they would almost certainly be cancelled or not renewed, running down the clock isn’t a terrible idea. The $300+m is already a sunk cost.

    • chuck
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      No say will cancel it and then pause it then cancel the landing gear then pause that then cancel it pause it till it comes back looking like the avro arrow

  • Yoga
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    17 hours ago

    https://www.saab.com/markets/canada/gripen-for-canada/built-for-canada-by-canada

    From another page:

    “In addition, Canada will have full and exclusive control over Gripen’s secure data – a unique advantage of our offer. The Gripen Centre in Montreal will host all work on the fighter’s mission system and Canadians will carry out this work. With the mission system, communications and technical data all hosted in Canada, Gripen exceeds all industrial, security and controlled goods requirements. With Gripen the Royal Canadian Air Force will have maximum control over sensitive data handling.”

    It’s a no brainer, in a world of digital warfare, needing to rely on a foreign home base is a tremendous liability.

    • wise_pancake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      How are they the only ones offering that, that needs to be table stakes to even bid

  • Avid AmoebaOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Doug Ford spent much more on canceling various contracts on a whim. I say bail.

  • Aconite
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Fuck it. They’re an intelligence hazard and that’s cheap in government terms.

    • Avid AmoebaOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yes. In this case I linked it on purpose because of their handlers.

      • AlolanVulpix
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago
        1. But it continues the notion that we should rely on them for information, when they have most certainly poisoned Canadian culture and politics.
        2. Also, by sending users to an American site, it increases their revenues, when this money could have gone to a Canadian media site.
        3. And if you aren’t already aware, Canadian owned media is deliberately neglected because it’s contrary to a particular elite group in this country… And yeah, we should support and grow Canadian owned media regardless of political party.

        But if you still insist on supporting American media…

  • Nils
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    These are numbers from 2016. Is there any place where we can read these contracts? Maybe with the current situation, conditions are changing. Hopefully, people put a clause in case of animosity between countries.