• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      No, Twitter is worse IMO. Truth social has always been a steaming pile of shit that non-fascists avoid. Twitter used to be viewed in a positive light and a lot of organizations and governments still use it as a communication medium - sometimes an exclusive communication medium.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Twitter used to be viewed in a positive light

        It never was though. Studies always showed that it increase anxiety in the users. Hell, I’m trying to use Bsky to support artists trying to move away from twitter and the while it’s not too bad, the character limit is forcing me to simplify my thoughts to the point that they’re no longer specific enough not to create new conflict. Is this how twitter always was?

        • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I considered Twitter as one of the horsemen of the apocalypse, and that was years before musk bought it.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Twitter was awesome pre-2015 then something happened…can’t quite figure out what brought a bunch of assholes to the platform…hmm…

          And if you feel forced to simplify your thoughts to fit the character limit, you’re simply using the wrong service

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            Well, the person I’m commenting under is using the wrong service. But it’s easier to simply not comment or even “engage” in anyway then it is to get into arguments because of a miscommunication.

        • IronKrill
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          It depends on what you mean my positive light but generally I would say you’re wrong. Twitter had a dedicated fan base well into this decade and was where every business and personality had an account for a reason. Yes people knew of negative social media effecta but Twitter definitely had a fairly wide spread cult following.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            where every business and personality had an account for a reason

            to sell shit

            Also, it seems weird to say a mainstream social media platform cult following.

            • IronKrill
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              it seems weird to say a mainstream social media platform cult following.

              I agree the word choice is a bit odd. I meant in the sense that Twitter had a dedicated userbase that used it a lot and sort of glorified it. You weren’t talking with your friends or posting online, you were “Tweeting at your mutuals”. The most succinct way I could put it was “cult”, in the same sense that movies and TV have “cult” followings: a dedicated group that enjoys and bases some part of their personality around it.

              • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                15 hours ago

                “Cult following” refer to fanbases for obscure media, like Wraith or Ice Pirates. Star Wars does not have a Cult following.