• leisesprecher@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    20 hours ago

    But that’s exactly what Microsoft promised its shareholders and why they invested billions into it. They need world changing revenue to make it worthwhile.

    • Broken@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Exactly. And that’s why people are misunderstanding the sentiment. Its not that AI doesn’t have value, its that it doesn’t have revenue. They want more return on investment before investing more.

      I can criticize Microsoft all day, but that logic in itself isn’t bad business. Of course the counter argument is they have the money to float the difference until they turn a profit. But I’m not in the habit of saying how other people should spend their money.

      • Pete Hahnloser@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        They’re reaping what they sowed in zero-interest-rate days. Can’t really generate revenue when your user base is used to everything being free.

        • underisk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          im doubtful these things could turn a profit if their price started to reflect their resource cost. has anyone actually come up with an application of AI so revolutionary that people wouldn’t happily abandon if it cost like $300/mo to use?