Connolly secured his position on the pivotal Oversight Committee after leaders in the House Democratic caucus—most notably former Speaker Nancy Pelosi—backed Connolly’s bid over Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez.

While other Democratic leaders have been fumbling for a response to Trump, the administration has been in a public feud with Ocasio-Cortez. Tom Homan, Trump’s handpicked immigration czar, has even called on the Department of Justice to investigate the congresswoman after she advised migrant communities of their constitutional rights.

In contrast to Connolly’s pro-compliance message, Ocasio-Cortez recently wrote, “America is not for sale. We have an obligation to resist kings. We outnumber them. And they can be overwhelmed.”

  • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Considering what Trump and L1 are doing, Democrats should put every rock they find into their path. Instead they do this. Cowardice.

  • TheRealKuni@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    in a CNN appearance on Sunday, Connolly said workers should comply for now.

    “I guess if you can, cover yourself and do the five things you did last week just to be able to say, ‘well I did it,’” he advised.

    Obviously Congressional Democrats need to fight, but this sure sounds to me like he’s just telling Federal employees to cover their bases in case the courts rule DOGE does have authority. This is their livelihood, after all.

    Maybe I’m misunderstanding.

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      It’s also much different than what the headline suggests.

      Still bad though. They should already have a plan. They’re not nearly quick enough as a body to handle what’s going on.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Democratic Rep. Gerry Connolly, the highest-ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, said government workers should comply with an Elon Musk order that is being disputed by others. Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency sent out an email…

    Thank you Nancy Pelosi!

  • Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Everyone downvoted me and called me an idiot when I said the Dems are weak and useless. Most of them don’t have a spine.

    • Nutteman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      People lost their minds when I suggested the dems are at fault for losing so badly, not protest voters. It’s funny as hell thinking the old guard of the democratic party will ever become effective

      • Soulg@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        Both of them are at fault. The voters are just as culpable for being so misinformed about what was at stake, and the democrats should’ve told them more.

        But the info was all available, so that’s not an excuse.

      • corsicanguppy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        This has been explained so, so, so-so, so so so.many times. How is it still not understood?

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I have been thinking, even though there are genuinely tone deaf, smug, urban elite centrist Democrats who call everyone who disagrees with them as plain stupid-- instead of acknowledging that the once reliable working-class and rural voters that supported Democrats felt abandoned by jobs outsourcing went over to the Republicans-- I reckon some accounts are also bots to amplify this disdain by centrist Democrats on the conservative-voting working-class, in order to further widen the partisan gap.

      So much had been reported of Russia funding far-right populist parties, but there is also Russia funding the left or at least being suspiciously friendly. Putin is cosy with the former centre left German chancellor, Gerhard Schroder, who have worked in Russian energy firms. Jill Stein rob votes from Democrats during presidential elections and she is hesitant to call Putin a dictator (like Trump). Many far-left parties in Europe also either have warm or ambivalent feeling towards Russia, and are reluctant to support Ukraine.

      Unlike during the Cold War when the Soviet Union solely funded radical far-left groups (while the US supported right wing dictatorships), the current meddling and psy-ops from current Russia don’t have any ideological preference to support in order to destabilise the West. Russia simply throws all the wrench they could get into the machine.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Wow, the cancer must have spread to his brain.

    Lets hope it finishes him off soon, fuck this fascist colloborating sack of shit.

  • riot@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The Dems are so good at being the opposition party that they are… complying with the fascists? This is pathetic.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    145
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If nothing else, this whole situation is a very revealing about which Democrat politicians have proverbial balls, which ones have their balls in the clamp (probably for doing embarrassing stuff), and which ones have no proverbial balls at all.

    So far only AOC, Sanders, Pritzker, and a handful of others are showing they have the guts to stand up on the bullshit the administration is pulling.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Obligatory reminder that Sanders is categorically excluded from being a “Democrat with proverbial balls” not because he doesn’t have balls, but because he isn’t a Democrat. I deny the Democratic Party credit for his courage.

    • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s not about balls, it’s about loyalty. AOC and the like have loyalty to the country while corporate Dems have loyalty to corporate interests.

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      After the Bernie Sanders’ “stop arms sale to Israel vote”, I can confidently say %90 of democrats are just worthless human shits who would have fared just as well being members of the Republic party or United Russia (Putin’s party) or AKP (Erdoğan’s party). As long as they got a seat of some power to glue their sweaty asses to, they will adapt to anything.

    • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      15 hours ago

      The problem I have with this take is that we knew 4 years ago too. For some of them, we’ve known for decades. We should have already been primarying them out, but between local ratfuckery and a lack of funding for primary challengers, we’re stuck with these assholes at a critical moment.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      So far only AOC, Sanders, Pritzker, and a handful of others are showing they have the guts to stand up on the bullshit the administration is pulling.

      I really want to include the new DNC chair in that list.

      “We’re calling it the ‘Organize Everywhere’ tour,” Martin told ABC13. “It’s a simple premise that if we’re going to win throughout this country and get back into power, we have to organize everywhere. We’re visiting red states, purple states, and blue states on this tour. And Texas really is the future of the Democratic Party. This is such a critical battleground state as we move forward in the 2026 elections – of course, the 28 election cycle and beyond.”

      And

      “We have to earn their trust back, and part of that is not just showing up a few months before the election and asking them for their vote,” Martin said. “We have to get back to organizing year-round where we’re building trust with communities around shared values.”

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/abc13-has-1-on-1-with-new-democratic-national-committee-chair-ken-martin/ar-AA1zI1f4

      Like, he’s had the chair a month, and he’s going out and doing local station news interviews already.

      For the past 30 years every other chair would have been grifting huge dollar donors in exchange for more conservative policy positions right now.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Like, he’s had the chair a month, and he’s going out and doing local station news interviews already.

        I really feel like they all need to be doing this, as much as possible. Get out there and publicize just how fucked things are, and what they’re doing to fight back, and how Trump’s cronies control the entire government right now and what’s happening is directly their fault.

      • deadtom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Not trying to be an asshole but if you expect anything will materially change you shouldn’t be surprised when the DNC rug pulls you again.

        I really want to include the new DNC chair in that list.

        I strongly disagree.

        “There are a lot of good billionaires out there that have been with Democrats, who share our values, and we will take their money. But we’re not taking money from those bad billionaires” - New DNC Head Martin

        The DNC is run by corporate democrats which, aside from the hate, racism and bigotry, might well be the on the same team as Republicans when it comes to facilitating the actions of the wealthy in this country. Its why nothing materially changes when Dems run the show. Their wealthy donors are happy with the job they are doing currently, which doesn’t include improving the quality of life for the vast majority of us because it is easier to exploit a populous that is teetering on the edge of ruin. How many of you cant change jobs because you’d lose your insurance? How few Americans have 500 dollars in the bank for a catastrophic emergency? The fact that we have to live in such a precarious position is a feature to the wealthy that allows them to exploit us for their significant personal gains. They don’t see us as people, they see us as a resource to exploit and toss when they are done.

        Did Biden push for Universal healthcare, or even talk about it really? What about pressing for codifying of Roe v. Wade? Or wage theft being, from a dollar perspective, the vast majority of theft that occurs in this country? Marijuana reform? Better to leave that as a carrot to try to get votes as they’ve shown in the last 3 elections… What about taxing the rich as a rebuttal to the constant assault on social services that help the most vulnerable in our society yet account for the smallest fraction of the actual budget? Or upholding the law and holding Trump and his cronies for the January 6th attack on our nation, which should have prevented Trump from running in the first place? The wealthy in this country are seeing their wealth explode from a government that today has enabled them to wholesale embrace corruption by attacking regulatory and oversight bodies… wonder why they didnt want Trump to be held accountable…

        Biden did things in his term to help Americans to an extent, but these Donkeys in the room are glaring examples of areas that Biden had flat out ignored or intentionally neglected us. The reason to me is that the money didn’t support those initiatives… i.e. not in the donors interests.

        Remember that the DNC put Biden there, and if we let them they will happily keep playing the role of controlled opposition as a fulcrum to leverage our nation to the right while giving lip service to the things we care about and enriching themselves with our donations.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Why are so many people stuck on a single comment he made during the DNC chair campaign when he was asked if he’d take donations from billionaires?

          Do you legitimately think he’d have won the chair election by answering no?

          And why did so many people all discover this comment from over a month ago about 48 hours ago?

          I’m legitimately asking because I followed the chair election pretty damn closely, and even at the time it was made it just wasn’t a big deal…

          But most importantly:

          I really want to include the new DNC chair in that list.

          I didn’t say he should be, I said I want to include him.

          He has a long and respectable history at the state level, and I have no reason not to be optimistic that he’ll stay that way…

          Yet.

          So I want him to keep doing the right thing and earn on a spot on that list.

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Why the absolute about-face from you on the DNC over the last couple weeks?

            Why are so many people stuck on a single comment he made during the DNC chair campaign when he was asked if he’d take donations from billionaires?

            They’re not stuck on this single comment. They’re seeing the trend from the DNC over the last few decades and seeing more of the same in his statement.

            Do you legitimately think he’d have won the chair election by answering no?

            And what does that tell you about where their allegiance lies? I can’t believe you think this comment helps your argument.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              14 hours ago

              Why the absolute about-face from you on the DNC over the last couple weeks?

              I’ve been saying since the day Biden lost that the DNC chair election determines if I support the DNC as hard as possible or push for a third party.

              Ken Martin was one of the candidates I consider “good enough”.

              They’re seeing the trend from the DNC over the last few decades and seeing more of the same in his statement.

              It would be easier to see that side of it, if there was more than one I cident of him saying something “bad”.

              Dude was campaigning in an election where voting members of the DNC were the only ones who could vote. A “hard no” would have prevented him from becoming chair.

              And what does that tell you about where their allegiance lies?

              Who cares?

              Their only power is electing a chair in years a republican is president.

              That’s all the DNC is really, some people who vote on who the chair is, and around 20 people in other leadership positions the chair appoints.

              The DNC is not some huge unchangeable monolith, don’t blame fresh leadership for last 30 years of shit decisions.

              Now, I answered all your questions. So if you’d be so kind I’m legitimately interested in this:

              And why did so many people all discover this comment from over a month ago about 48 hours ago?

              Where and when did you first see that comment?

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        This may be cynical but this just sounds like he wants to make people fall in line and adopt more Texas style right-wing politics.

        The “we have to regain their trust” line could be copy and pasted from just about every corporate non-apology in existence. This instills little hope in me for the future of the Democratic party.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          This may be cynical but this just sounds like he wants to make people fall in line and adopt more Texas style right-wing politics.

          The “we have to regain their trust” line could be copy and pasted from just about every corporate non-apology in existence. This instills little hope in me for the future of the Democratic party.

          The man didn’t magically appear when you learned his name…

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ken_Martin#Minnesota_DFL_chair

          He wins elections with progressive candidates, because that’s what increases dem turnout.

          What more do you want from a party chair?

          If he’s dirty, where’s the dirt from the time he ran a state party?

          • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I didn’t say anything of his qualifications or history. I said I think his statements and future plans sound like more of the same ineffective lip service and rightward drift.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              50 minutes ago

              I said I think his statements and future plans sound like more of the same ineffective lip service and rightward drift.

              Statement

              You’re judging him on one quick answer to a question while he was campaigning and ignoring, well, literally everything else.

              And his future plans is literally the opposite of what you’re saying, because that doesn’t win elections.

              Again, you can look at his long history in Minnesota

    • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      But until many states have elections which pass United Nations reviews, and international witnesses, and stop having oligarchs counting the votes without oversight. All of this is just pandering to reasonable people. Just words with no weight. Hopes and dreams. The voice at the back of one’s head while doing something stupid.

  • meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Connolly backs Musk’s farce, showing even oversight can crumble under the weight of vanity projects.

    😾

  • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Just to state the obvious, you should be bitching at your representatives, state and federal, all the time.

    Yes, that includes me too. And no, I don’t do it either.

  • SarcasticMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    And now the party should primary him…too bad the party is a feckless shell of bullshit wrapped around a bunch of greedy little piggies.

    • frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The people can primary him. Need 1,000 qualified signatures first though. The party won’t like it but they can’t stop you from running in a primary against him and making him answer to these issues.