This is the very essence of the difference that should exist between a President and a King. From Federalist 69:

The President of the United States would be liable to be impeached, tried, and, upon conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors, removed from office; and would afterwards be liable to prosecution and punishment in the ordinary course of law. The person of the king of Great Britain is sacred and inviolable; there is no constitutional tribunal to which he is amenable; no punishment to which he can be subjected without involving the crisis of a national revolution. In this delicate and important circumstance of personal responsibility, the President of Confederated America would stand upon no better ground than a governor of New York, and upon worse ground than the governors of Maryland and Delaware.

The failure of the Republican party to support this kind of check on Presidential power is why we’re having this crisis now.

  • mRbLUE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Groundwork for a coup by the sounds of it. When the next election is supposed to happen I wonder if he’ll declare martial law due to some invented issue.

  • demizerone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    That fucking Lizard Peter Thiel fucking rebooted when asked about the popular support for Luigi. The mother fucker had not thought about what happens when we the people get tired of their shit and unite against them. They’ve spent so much time and money dividing us so they can take it all it never occurred that it might backfire.

    • b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That blubbering little weasel. “Y-y-you have to find another way.” I think was the line he used. We tried other ways. Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent revolution inevitable. Luigi showed how to fight back with some effect.

      • C A B B A G E@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Thiel, Yarvin etc., are all so convinced of their own superiority that any actual challenge to their world view/tactics is completely unexpected. They can only comprehend doing violence to people who won’t do anything about it. They get their rocks off over child murderers, and state sanctioned violence, but cry when the people they want to step on show and ounce of spine. It’s pathetic.

  • perestroika@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I add the following as evidence of premeditation / conspiracy:

    https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/04/inside-the-new-right-where-peter-thiel-is-placing-his-biggest-bets

    “I think Trump is going to run again in 2024,” he [Vance] said. “I think that what Trump should do, if I was giving him one piece of advice: Fire every single midlevel bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state, replace them with our people.”

    “And when the courts stop you,” he went on, “stand before the country, and say—” he quoted Andrew Jackson, giving a challenge to the entire constitutional order—“the chief justice has made his ruling. Now let him enforce it.”

    This is a description, essentially, of a coup.

    “We are in a late republican period,” Vance said later, evoking the common New Right view of America as Rome awaiting its Caesar. “If we’re going to push back against it, we’re going to have to get pretty wild, and pretty far out there, and go in directions that a lot of conservatives right now are uncomfortable with.”

    “Indeed,” Murphy said. “Among some of my circle, the phrase ‘extra-constitutional’ has come up quite a bit.”

    Historical note: as far as I understand, president Jackson ignored the Supreme Court in a case of Georgia taking Cherokee lands. Since the state also ignored, the court failed to enforce its ruling.

  • Jumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Time to use those guns you’ve been hoarding. Wasn’t that the reason you’re even allowed to have them?

      • BigBenis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I don’t think so. He has the charisma of a flat tire and it was early enough that any sympathy wave would have lost its momentum by November.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Charisma is not relevant. Do you think Lyndon Johnson had charisma? Do you think that’s why he was elected in 1964? Because people liked him?

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              I admit I was not alive at the time, but I’m pretty sure, what with it being the 1960s, that was not the sort of thing the general public was aware of, so I doubt it.

              Also, like it or not, Vance was already elected to the Senate and had a bestselling book. Even though you (and I) do not understand it, some people think he has a magnetic personality. Just like they think about Trump, which I also do not understand.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  Journalists were not the general public. 99% of the country had never personally interacted with him and those things were not reported in the news. They’re after-the-fact anecdotes in books.

                  I’m also old enough to remember when the press had the collective attitude of “let America think that the president is a good person” regardless of who was in office.

    • rational_lib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Not yet. Trump saying something horrifying while it not being entirely clear he understands what he’s actually saying or how anything in government is supposed to work is what we call Monday around here.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You don’t want the military intervening they might decide to run things in a manner efficient for the end user instead of the rich people!

        • rational_lib@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Historically, this is not usually the result of the military taking over a country. Usually the general who did the coup becomes the new rich person, thanks to all the political power.

          • Maiq@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Unless they are a person of integrity. Say for instance George Washington, Nicola wanted him to rule, he said nah bro!

            We just need the general who removes tyrant trump to be a man who believes in his oath to defend our nations constitution written by we the people, passed down for generations and defended by the blood of those who came before his tenure. I don’t doubt there is such honor still among those who serve. After all it is their oath to defend our construction from enemy’s both foreign and domestic. Our dictator and chief fits both.

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      When I was little, long before I had a reason to want it to be true, I had this theory that the Secret Service, which is obviously not a secret, was called that because they had a secret mandate: If the President ever gets really out of pocket and goes for dictator powers, it’s their job to execute him as a traitor.

      Anyway, I doubt it’s true, but I’ve been thinking about it a lot lately.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The Praetorian Guard killed some emperors, but that isn’t an official duty of the Secret Service. Of course, it wasn’t an official duty of the Praetorian Guard either.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I feel like the more likely scenario is if someone really wanted to do it, they wouldn’t, but they’d let it happen by inaction if someone else did it.

          Oh shit, I didn’t see that shooter.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        There’s no proper channels for this. Either the military leadership is motivated or they’re not.

          • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic

            It’s the domestic part we have to concern ourselves with, and thankfully the Joint Chiefs seem to still think he’s an idiotic shitbag

            • C A B B A G E@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              They might think he’s a shitbag, but I bet they’re not unhappy with him. Unless he threatens to cut their spending?

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    This is the step where the cart goes over the top of the hill, you’re not coming back if this starts.

    Hard to hear, but if goes forward, this does signal that it’s breaking windows time. We all have a Luigi line, start really considering where yours is…

    Especially if you’re young, and they are doing this before you have been able to establish your own career or a family of your own, the rest of the world needs your strength and energy in these moments. Make no mistake, they are threatening you directly, they want to sell your future for a small profit added to the pile they are hoarding. Decide how hard you want to fight against that

    • untorquer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Especially if you’re older and know that everything you’ve worked for is at risk. Especially if you’re middle aged and your hope of a comfortable old age is being destroyed. Especially if you have family, and know your children’s future depends on it.

      I know you mean well but fuck ageism, the youth always fight. They don’t need a pep talk, older people do.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        13 hours ago

        And then there are the rest of us. Not quite young anymore, but we were robbed of the chance to even have anything to anchor us down. We’ve been squeezed out of the housing market nearly our entire adult lives. We never could justify having a child, perhaps because of money, perhaps because our consciences wouldn’t let us, perhaps because of both. We job-hop every few years already, as it’s the only way we’ve ever received a sizable pay raise.

        There is no house, no child, and no job for us to worry about losing. I don’t know about y’all, but I’ve been doing little more than fighting to get by for far too long.

        I’m ready to fight for something else.

      • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Heh. I’m middle aged and the only hope of comfort I’ve ever had for my elder years is chemical. I’m what you call an optimist.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The objection was always that somebody dark-skinned might be President, or that assets might be expropriated from billionaires, not that tyranny might be an issue.

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Random acts mean nothing but support for the other Minecraft team as the idiot centrists decry the violence.

          America’s problem is that its resistance is made of a fractured left. Things will have to get bad to get a rebellion going, and quite frankly I think the blue states would seceed first.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      What are they supposed to say? If they say anything they’re gonna have the SS knocking on their door.

  • Shawdow194@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The Trump administration is not refusing to share power with an opposing party. It is refusing to follow the constitutional limits of a government that its own party controls completely.

  • CileTheSane
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 hours ago

    And unless someone enforces the rules and consequences for breaking them for the first time in his miserable fucking life, he will be correct.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    182
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    “Oh, shit, so you mean Biden could have just cancelled all that student debt anyway?”

    “Well of course not, don’t be stupid!”

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      100
      ·
      18 hours ago

      That’s the problem with being on the side of the rule of law: you’re constrainted by it, but the side of lawlessness is not.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        60
        ·
        17 hours ago

        being on the side of the rule of law

        Except when you override prohibitions on arming a county in defiance of the ICC because it’s Israel.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          If I challenged you to write an email to a prominent politician, celebrity or business leader asking them to use their access to the media to advocate for Palestine every time you talked about Joe Biden, would you do it?

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          76
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          17 hours ago

          You know he’s not president anymore, right? And that party lost the election?

          Now we’ve got a guy who’s excited for ethnic cleansing so he can open a casino in Gaza.

          Congratulations.

          • randon31415@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            You know he’s not president anymore, right? And that party lost the election?

            Maybe, just maybe, it is because something is wrong in-of-itself and not because it is a wedge issue used to demotivate voters?

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          in defiance of the ICC because it’s Israel.

          Without commenting on the US’s attitude towards Israel, the US is not party to the ICC so no act is defiance because the ICC doesn’t have jurisdiction.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Congrats! You are the toad in the (now) boiling water. Pat yourself on the back for a job well done.

          • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Even if they are not American, they are fucked as well.

            They helped hand over the strongest military in the history of the world to fascists. Fascists do not stop at their borders. They are like locusts, hell bent on murder and conquering. I’m glad I got passports so I can get my wife and kids out when shit hits the fan.

            • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              14 hours ago

              I’m glad I got passports so I can get my wife and kids out when shit hits the fan.

              So, um, I have some good news and some bad news…

    • poo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I mean, it’s not going to stop until that fat orange thing is having its brains scraped off the pavement. Hopefully sooner than later.

      • Lem Jukes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Hate to break it to you but kinda tip of the iceberg. And murdering trump would absolutely serve to make him a co-opted martyr and throw us into the absolute fucking deep end.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      best I can do is the democratic party going “tsk tsk” geriatrically.

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        What they’re doing as a result of constituent pressure is voting ‘no’ on everything. It’s not having a huge impact yet because confirming cabinet appointments only needs 51 votes, and Republicans have that with a few to spare.

        The place it’ll be meaningful is on the debt ceiling increase, where it will take Democratic votes to pass it in both houses.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          which it will. the impotent party couldn’t even push aside an extremely malnourished fuckface to get into a building.

          voting no, lol.

          • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            The “malnourished fuckface” was working for Triple Canopy, part of what used to be called Blackwater. Talk is easy. Taking a bullet is not.