- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
U.S. President Donald Trump will pause new tariffs on Mexico for one month after Mexico agreed to reinforce its northern border with 10,000 National Guard members to stem the flow of illegal drugs, particularly fentanyl, he said on Monday on social media.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said the agreement also includes a U.S. commitment to act to prevent trafficking of high-powered weapons to Mexico. The two leaders spoke by phone on Monday, just hours before U.S. tariffs on Mexico, China and Canada were set to take effect.
The two counties will use the month-long pause to engage in further negotiations, Trump said.
You must log in or register to comment.
What a little bitch.
Big manly man Trump got whipped by a lady. A Jewish lady. A Jewish lady who’s also Latina! If she was also black, it would be the perfect irony.
How???
The cheeto wanted us (México) to be more aggresive as their lower border to prevent migrants from coming over… we agreed to his terms and we got a single month to comply, how is that him getting whipped? He got what he wanted, he bent us over (just like the expresident from the same party in power).
Even worse, this will only encourage him to ask for more things since he can get away with it.If you mean about the weapons part… I expect him to not keep his word, specially since the narcos in México are in full power and they need their weapons.
I don’t see how this is a loss for trump. He got Mexico to do something he presumably wanted.
He didn’t get what he wanted at all. He tried to look tough, the world pointed out he was shooting himself in the foot, then he backed down like a bitch.
If you think all he wanted was some national guard troops patrolling the border and that’s all this was about, I don’t know what to tell you.
Delaying something as big as tariffs by a month is not some kind of epic loss.
He got Mexico to the table and Mexican troops to maybe stop some smuggling. This is how Trump negotiates he does ridiculous things that hopefully force responses.
When was Mexico refusing to be at the table? There is an open relationship and trade agreements in place already… if Trump wanted to talk to Mexico about anything he could have done so with zero barriers
In the meantime, you can rest assured that to “bring Mexico” to the imaginary table they were not in, he torpedoed 100% of trust anyone in the world could possibly have about any contract or agreement with the USA
This isn’t a normal rational thing. This is Trump using schoolyard bully tactics. Mexico went the appeasement route. Trump doesn’t care about anyone respecting the US, he cares what he can get them to do for him.
Yes, I know how kids act… the point is that he is cutting the USA’s nose to spite its face… so not sure how is that any “win” for the USA…
He got Mexico to maybe to something and you call that a successful negotiation?
This is all a matter of perspective. Did he achieve anything meaningful? Of course not. Did he get Mexico to respond to an action that he did? Yes. Can he use the response (doesn’t matter what it is) to say his action is working? Yes. Again he doesn’t care about the response, Trump cares about optics.
Do the same thing with Canada. Trump impressed an action (the tariffs) that caused a response (Canada to implement their own tariffs). Can we apply the same logic to the opposite response? Did Canada do something(again doesn’t matter what) to an action trump did? Yes they did. Trump can now spin it and say look it’s working.
Of course, it’s working at doing something. Eroding our relationships with our neighbors. But he can spin it to his base anyway he wants because he can claim they did “it” (again the it is just the response, doesn’t matter what response) because of an action he took (imposed the tariffs).
His base is only looking at what Trump says not what was done. So if Trump claims it was successful, they believe it.
Sorry… as long as nations don’t ignore him, it’s a win? Is that really what you’re saying?
No, I guess I should have explored that option as well. The lack of response is still a response. So Trump can still claim to his base" see it’s working" and claim it as a win.
I know it’s difficult to imagine that in stakes so large, countries economies (hell the world economy) can be manipulated in such a way that no matter what factually and verifiability happens, it can be spun in a way to say it’s a win and there’s a group of people that take it at its face and says “yay! Keep going!”
Other countries are in a damned if you, damned if you don’t situation. As are the rest of the United States citizens that don’t support these actions (or can’t see them because they are believing the president of the US when he says “we’re winning”). The only thing we can do at this point is try to wake up trump supporters and hope that is done in time to affect change.
If not, we are at the mercy of whatever he does. Complaining about it and pointing out how obvious it is, does nothing. Go talk to some people that support him. Families that voted him in and have illegal immigrants in their family are getting a hard dose of that wake up call in their own. But until we get so many people that can’t be ignored, nothing will happen. It will become similar to Russia where the state controls the media and everything is a “win”, even invading acountry that did nothing to provoke invasion.
Mexico has essentially agreed to pay tribute, now it’s a matter of finding out the price. Yes I call that a Trump win. Produce keeps coming in and he gets to take credit for whatever Mexico agrees to.
Paid tribute? What are you even talking about?
And what do you think he wants from Canada? As far as I can tell he just doesn’t like Trudeau
No idea, I’m not even sure Trump knows what he wants. It seems like a fishing expedition to me. Throw out some wild tarrifs and see what happens.
Throw out some wild tarrifs and see what happens.
Do you think that is a good way to run the most powerful nation on Earth?
No, but it’s what’s happening.
I don’t see how this is a loss for trump. He got Mexico to do something he presumably wanted.
Businesses like predictability. Even if something is going to be expensive in the future, businesses are okay with that as long as they know its coming and can plan/make changes. What trump did was the exact opposite. He introduce uncertain and has lost trust with the largest businesses in the world.
Some of his biggest supporters and enablers and big business. He just dropped his pants and took a shit in their backyard with this.
No business is ok with arbitrarily paying more, even if it is predictable. That’s why they built factories in Mexico in the first place, because it was cheaper. Businesses also aren’t a monolith in their preferences, Amazon would happily take 4 years of chaos if it forces many competitors out of business. Similarly musk/Tesla isn’t ready to compete with other car companies (US, EU, or China) actually trying to make EVs, more chaos on his competition is great for him.
No business is ok with arbitrarily paying more, even if it is predictable. That’s why they built factories in Mexico in the first place, because it was cheaper.
You stopped reading mid sentence apparently. The rest of my sentence in my post was “businesses are okay with that as long as they know its coming and can plan/make changes.” Those changes could be moving manufacturing, scaling different product lines, finding substitutions for what those forecasted more-expensive inputs are, etc. The factories in Mexico a response to a predictable rising labor market in the USA. So yes, manufacturers were okay with paying higher costs in the USA temporarily while the Mexican factories were set up or expanded.
Businesses also aren’t a monolith in their preferences,
True, but they largely follow the same trends. Outliers are outliers by definition.
Amazon would happily take 4 years of chaos if it forces many competitors out of business.
If its a sure thing, probably, but with Musk as President Amazon is just as likely to be hurt by the next 4 years. Musk is no fan of Bezos and Musk has a history of taking personal grudges into business dealings. (see Musk suing his own twitter advertising customers)
Similarly musk/Tesla isn’t ready to compete with other car companies (US, EU, or China) actually trying to make EVs, more chaos on his competition is great for him.
Musk has poisoned the previous good name of Tesla among its customers. Tesla opponents weren’t buying Tesla before, and now former Tesla proponents aren’t either. He’s pissing off the countries governments where he is trying to make inroads, and now handling the reigns of government pissing off future possible customers. There is nothing Musk is doing right now that is helping Tesla. He is only hurting them.
I knew Mexico and Canada would blink first (well, Canada hasn’t yet, but it’s a matter of time).
Now the bully thinks that he can wave his favorite toy (tariffs) around and get whatever he wants. Mexico had a ton of leverage in this situation. Where does most American produce come from this time of year? Where are so many cars manufactured that are destined for the US? That’s right, it’s Mexico.
I knew Mexico and Canada would blink first
What are you talking about? Mexican president always signalled that her country is ready to cooperate to fight cartels.
It is Trump who blinked - he delayed tarrifs he wanted to intruduce to appease his fascist voter base.
Canada may hold out longer than you think. “Go fuck yourself Trump.” seems to be the prevailing public sentiment.
So say we all
Especially with an election on the horizon. Any party campaigning on capitulation is going to be radioactive to most voters.
The only source in this article is Trump saying this is what happened. Don’t trust what Trump is saying directly. He’s already previously mislead to make it seem like other countries caved when they really did almost nothing
Sadly other news sources reported it. Dumb move from Mexico that will give the orange bully more power over them and others.
That’s missing what I’m saying
They’re giving Trump’s spin in reporting inadvertently or not
They’re not providing context for how much of a change (or not) Mexico actually is making
They are reporting Mexico sending 10k troops to border.
And note it doesn’t say additional troops nor note how many are already there
I’m not sure how many are currently there but they’ve previously had higher numbers. Like in 2019 they sent 15k
Is it really dumb? The tariffs hurt both sides. Things will be much more expensive for us, and because they are more expensive, less of Mexican things will be bought. When Mexico uses retaliatory tariffs, same thing happens, bit this time in reverse.
Everyone loses.
Yeah, it was a really weak move by them.
It made them seem weak, but also they still get to pay tariffs in a month
Mexico doesn’t pay the tarrifs, Americans will pay the tarrif. It’s just a fancy word for tax. Call it import tax, Trump import tax. Do you see it ? It’s meant to make US made more attractive by making imports more expensive. It also make Trump a very unreliable partner. Flip flopping all over the place.
I’m an idiot, thanks for the clarification
An idiot would’ve argued back without verifying. So not an idiot.
Hopefully Sheinbaum told Trump that she’d send the troops to the border ahorita.
Suddenly America is flooded with fentanyl disguised as every random pill you can imagine. The fear of medicine becomes as deadly as the fentanyl.
