• teri@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    I support the cause in general but: Signal is not federated at all. It may seem like a decent alternative to WhatsApp but is it really? It still falls under the same US jurisdiction. Let’s say the US gov starts agressively prosecuting dissidents and certain minorities (they already do): can and should we still use signal in this case? I don’t think so. Sadly i can’t name a much better alternative. Maybe matrix. But it has other issues.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    instead of switching ive mostly just been ditching entirely. I need less time interacting with internet people.

    literally the only thing on this list im still using is facebook messenger, for my work colleagues. and youtube. everything else ive migrated (reddit-lemmy), or abandoned and torched

    • Esmoreit@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Loops will be open sourced later they say.

      Is Loops open source? It will be! We plan on open sourcing the platform after it reaches a stable and easy to maintain state.

      • tempest
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        That really is not a satisfying answer. It is incredibly nebulous and even if it did have a nice definition I guarantee most software developers will tell you a lot of software rarely reaches that state.

        I can see why they might want to avoid 1000 GitHub issues bike shedding things but they could open source the code and just not have open contribution

        • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          Sometimes you’re ashamed of the ugly hacks you cobbled together to reach MVP, and you want to fix the stuff you know you need to fix first before being thrown to the wolves. I can respect that, for a limited time.

          • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I mean maybe but you could also just say “we did some whacky shit here help us fix it please” and let the community help you in the effort. That’s the beauty of open source. Then again they may have their reasons and frankly I’m not even interested in a TikTok like social media so w/e as long as they don’t eat up their word it’s fine.

      • potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        That means very little to me. Actions speak louder than words, and it would probably help the development of loops if it was actually open source.

          • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Which I think dansup should deserve our trust on this for quite a long time for doing. It isn’t empty promises if they already made Pixelfed and opensourced it.

            Like… I suppose it could be a grift, anything could but I see no reason to question their goals or motives.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          For a lot of FLOSS projects, it’s common to keep the initial team small, so a product can be delivered fast, and gets opened up later.

          It’s to solve the “too many cooks” and prevent bikeshedding.

          A lot of corpo espionage is there solely to tank potential competitors, which include FLOSS projects.

  • RedSnt@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 days ago

    I was already on Mastodon by just having a Vivaldi (the chromium browser) account, and it’s just lovely I’ve spent most of the day setting up lemmy, even though I joined feddit.dk 2 years ago, it’s only just now I’m taking it seriously.
    And, while not related to the fediverse per se, I switched to linux a year ago.
    The only service that’s hard to drop/switch away from is Youtube imo.

  • tisktisk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    Loops.video isn’t accepting new users atm. Even if it was, I got in on early signup and I have next to zero functionality out of it rn. Just informing the curious masses

      • Zeon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I agree. If it’s not libre from the start, we should not trust it. The term “open source” is ambiguous; they could just put it under some restrictive open-source license and then revert to closed source later. If it’s put under a free software license like the GPL, then I’ll feel better.

        • Daeraxa@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          That seems a little extreme. I would maybe agree if 1) it wasn’t being made by the guy who has already got an AGPL project in Pixelfed and 2) it was on open signups. Whilst software is invite-only or closed entirely I don’t really see a problem in it not being open-sourced.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      Loops really isn’t ready for primetime. It’s too new and unpolished, and will need a bit more time.

      I wonder if peertube can scale. YouTube has a whole sophisticated system for ingesting and transcoding videos into dozens of formats, with tradeoffs being made on computational complexity versus file size/bandwidth, which requires some projection on which videos will be downloaded the most times in the future (and by which types of clients, with support for which codecs, etc.). Doing this can require a lot of networking/computing/memory/storage resources, and I wonder if the software can scale.

    • aimizo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yeah it’s no where near ready for mass adoption. It’s made a couple improvements, but it crashes every time I try to leave a comment.

  • breadguyyyyyyyyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I keep seeing this type stuff but neither peertube or friendica are genuine replacements at this point, mastodon is weaksauce compared to akkoma or a misskey fork, and loops is alpha software. also yes signal is centralized but it just works and has contact discovery so it owns matrix and xmpp when compared to whatsapp. basically none of this stuff is truly ready

  • Opinionhaver@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    Switching from WhatsApp to any other messaging service isn’t a realistic option for quite many places. I’d be more than willing to switch but of all the people in my contacts (including my entire customer base) there’s like 3 people using Signal but every single one of them has WhatsApp. Even the 60+ year olds.