What Bill is he trying to pass that requires him to be Prime Minister? Why couldn’t he have put any legislature forward in the last 20 years?

  • LostWon
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    His purpose is probably to implement as many austerity measures as he thinks he can get away with in return for financial kickbacks from the wealthy.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    23 hours ago

    He’s not interested in being a part of the government unless he’s the one in charge.

    • BedSharkPal
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Hey, I remember this guy from group projects in HS - he’s the worst.

    • LostWon
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Then why did he spend his entire career in government?

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        He spent about half his career in government. Much of it has been spent in opposition.

        • GreyEyedGhost
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          16 hours ago

          He spent nearly half his life in government as an elected official. He has been involved in politics since he was 21, and was in university before that. He is literally a career politician.

          • sbv@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            When referring to MPs, “in government” refers to being part of the governing party. He is a career politician, landlord, and attack dog, but the Canadian electorate has only chosen his party to lead three times. He has spent a majority of his career yelling from the sidelines.

            • Hemingways_Shotgun
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 hours ago

              “in government” refers to being part of the governing party

              It most certainly does not. Outside of campaigns, there is no such thing as “liberal” government, or “conservative” government. There’s just “the government”.

              The official opposition is a part of the government. And ESPECIALLY in a minority parliament, all parties negotiate and compromise to get shit done because no one party has the votes to pass something on their own. That’s literally how government works.

              • sbv@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 hours ago

                The official opposition is a part of the government.

                From the House of Commons website:

                • The leader of the party having the support of the majority of the Members of the House of Commons is asked by the Governor General to form a government and becomes the Prime Minister;
                • The party, or parties, opposed to the government is called the opposition (the largest of these parties is referred to as the “official” opposition);
      • Hemingways_Shotgun
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        For the same reason most politicians get into it; Its the best position to be in if you’re looking to get your palms greased.

  • ImplyingImplications
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    Poilievre figured out that you don’t need to pass laws to be a successful politician. All you have to do is go viral on social media for hot takes and owning the libs.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      TBF they’ve all figured that out. He’s just pretty good at it, and lucked into becoming leader right as the other party is weak.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    He wants to be PM. Like Trudeau, Harper, Martin, Chretien, and the other forty-ish people who held office. As well as Freeland, Carney, etc.

    The guy isn’t likeable, and I think his policy positions are bad for the country, but wanting to be PM isn’t a bad thing.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Absolutely fucking nothing. Neither Trudeau nor Pollievre have any real policy proposals that they want to get through.

    • floofloof
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Trudeau has had many policies, just not necessarily as many as he promised or the ones you want. Poilievre has always just been a time waster, with only complaints and no ideas of his own. His trick is to be that guy who tells everyone else they’re doing things wrong, without ever explaining how he would do them right. Poilievre simply avoids doing serious politics.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Zero for PP

        Poilievre was a cabinet minister from 2013-2015 when Harper was PM. Given his rabid support of Harper, it’d be fair to say he was aligned on most of them.

        So it’d be at least 67 bills.

        Are they good policy? Are they good for Canada? Did they improve the lives of everyday Canadians? For the most part, probably not.

        Of course, he has his name on one bill, so there’s at least that.

        But saying he’s had “zero” passed is demonstrably false.

        • Someone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and other Acts and to make consequential amendments to certain Acts

          Catchy name, clearly he hadn’t started reading Dr. Seuss yet.

        • Grant_M
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Zero legislation of value for Canadians.

      • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        Call me when Trudeau reforms the election system like he has promised every single election.