NightOwl to World News@lemmy.ml · 13 hours agoRussia rejects idea of NATO peacekeepers in Ukraine, warning of "uncontrollable escalation"www.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up135arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up135arrow-down1external-linkRussia rejects idea of NATO peacekeepers in Ukraine, warning of "uncontrollable escalation"www.reuters.comNightOwl to World News@lemmy.ml · 13 hours agomessage-square6fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaregravityowl@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down13·edit-29 hours agoUkraine is not (yet?) NATO either, so why send troops there? Wouldn’t sending troops actually just escalate things further and drag the whole of NATO into it if anything were to happen to those soldiers?
minus-squarePilferjinx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down2·edit-26 hours agoUkraine needs a guaranteed security measure to prevent Russia from attacking again. It’s a stop gap to a more permanent solution. Either NATO membership or Nukes.
minus-squarewurzelgummidge@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 hour agoPerhaps Russia wouldn’t attack if it wasn’t provoked.
minus-squareNasan@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·7 hours agoWhy not both? Call the nukes a welcome to NATO bonus.
minus-squarebadbytes@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·4 hours agoPeacekeepers keep the peace silly boy.
Ukraine is not (yet?) NATO either, so why send troops there?
Wouldn’t sending troops actually just escalate things further and drag the whole of NATO into it if anything were to happen to those soldiers?
Ukraine needs a guaranteed security measure to prevent Russia from attacking again. It’s a stop gap to a more permanent solution. Either NATO membership or Nukes.
Perhaps Russia wouldn’t attack if it wasn’t provoked.
Why not both? Call the nukes a welcome to NATO bonus.
Peacekeepers keep the peace silly boy.