Summary

Italian police in Brescia face allegations of degrading treatment after seven female climate activists from Extinction Rebellion claimed they were forced to remove their underwear and perform squats during questioning.

The activists, detained after a protest against Leonardo, an aerospace company, accused police of singling out women for this treatment.

Police denied misconduct, stating the procedure was to search for dangerous objects.

The incident has prompted calls for an investigation from opposition politicians amid debates over a controversial security bill targeting climate activists with harsher penalties.

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The thing that people in the comments missing is the “activists” part. Here is more details from the article:

    The activists were among 22 people brought to Brescia’s main police station on Monday morning after officers interrupted a protest held outside the Italian aerospace and defence firm Leonardo’s factory.

    Activists have alleged that while there they were subjected to degrading treatment at the hands of police officers.

    In a video posted online, one member of Extinction Rebellion, the global environmental movement, said: “They asked me to undress, take off my underwear and do three squats, ‘for checks’, according to them.”

    The woman claimed the treatment was “only reserved for the females, not the males”.

  • john89
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Police denied misconduct, stating the procedure was to search for dangerous objects.

    Bullshit. Italian culture needs to grow the fuck up.

  • Omgboom@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Lol it’s to make sure you don’t have anything shoved up inside of you. It’s like you guys haven’t ever been arrested before.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_cavity_search#Procedure

    Squatting is sometimes instructed during the visual search, and prolonged holding of a squat can be demanded; squats are sometimes demanded while standing over a mirror (so that the observer has an improved view). The person may be asked to “squat and cough,” with the aim of dislodging an object stored in the rectum or vagina.

    Edit: For the record fuck the police always, but this is a pretty standard part of being searched before you are processed

    • ValiantDust@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 hours ago

      but this is a pretty standard part of being searched before you are processed

      Not everyone lives in the US. If I remember correctly, here in Germany they are not allowed to routinely do these searches (doesn’t mean they can’t do them, but it’s not standard when you are arrested). I think it’s based on EU laws, so the same probably applies to Italy.

    • HikingVet
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Then why are they saying only the women had to do this?

      Edit: I’ve never had a cavity search any of the times I have been arrested.

      • HikingVet
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        A lot of countries require the equivalent of probable cause to do a cavity search before entering institutions like prisons, jails, or asylums as a prisoner or patient.

    • HikingVet
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      From the same article

      United States edit

      In the United States, Bell v. Wolfish is the benchmark case on this issue. In its judgment of the case, the U.S. Supreme Court established a standard of reasonable grounds for performing cavity searches. Among these are security concerns at prisons. Such searches are generally governed by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits searches without probable cause.[3]

        • HikingVet
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The point of the matter is the previous poster said that it was standard, my response proved it wasn’t.

          If you read even the summary you will see that it wasn’t uniformly implemented.

          • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            It’s your loose interpretation of “it’s standard” that’s tripping you up. US case law has no relevance on what’s standard in Italy.

            • HikingVet
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              From the summary:

              The activists, detained after a protest against Leonardo, an aerospace company, accused police of singling out women for this treatment.

              Any other arguments that are D.O.A?

                • HikingVet
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 hours ago

                  Lol, doesn’t read the summary, uses overly broad terms and then points the finger at someone else.

                  Are ya sure?

    • Nikelui@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s like you guys haven’t ever been arrested before.

      I can’t say I have been, so thank you for the explanation.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “Yeah that doesn’t surprise me.” – Anyone whose ever seen an Italian Giallo film.