• Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Because it’s good PR. Pretend to be happy while you work to cordon off foreigners again

    • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Except they’re not cordoning us off, they’re doing the opposite by adding built-in translation functions.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        It’s a very recent development and such a change takes time. And of course the company behind the app is welcoming to new users, because it means growth, even when it comes with new headaches towards moderation and pressure from government.

        The company not scrambling to make the experience good for foreigners would be leaving money on the table. And no corporation wants to do that. But it’s not up to just them.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Obviously the Chinese government is a big thing and I’m sure there’s a lot of different opinions, but at least the foreign ministry has released official statements speaking positively of the exchanges.

            • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              If the foreign ministry was planning to split the userbase, they would be warning about malicious foreign influence, like the US did before they banned tiktok.

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                And why would they ever want do that? It’s a much better move to be all “this is great” and then quietly act to separate them. That way it looks good inside and outside and it won’t hurt the app. And they wouldn’t want to hurt the app, unlike the US who wanted to hurt TikTok.

                • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  It’s a much better move to be all “this is great” and then quietly act to separate them

                  If they say “this is great” and then separate them, they look like hypocrites.

                  If they say “beware the evil foreign influence” and then act, then people will presume that the evil foreigners were doing bad things, as half of lemmy is doing with the tiktok ban.

                  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    If they say “this is great” and then separate them, they look like hypocrites.

                    Governments do that all the time and a lot of people just don’t care. Censorship can rile people up much more than just being hypocrites.

                    Quietly is kinda the operative word. Publicly say one thing, then quietly do another when the interest dies down. People will notice but not nearly as many will care or even hear about it if you do it slowly and quietly.

                    If they say “beware the evil foreign influence” and then act, then people will presume that the evil foreigners were doing bad things

                    I don’t think Chinese are that stupid, they’ll know it was just another censorship move from their government. But it saying that will paint them and the app in a really bad light and there’s really no reason to do that. You want foreigners to use it, you want them to think you’re happy to be open and all. Then you just do differently. Because not as many people will know or care.