I’ve been wondering—does a Fediverse-based equivalent to Discord exist?

I know there are alternatives like Matrix, Revolt, etc., but what I’m looking for is something more akin to Discord that’s Decentralized, Open-Sourced, and makes use of ActivityPub.

If it doesn’t exist, has anyone ever thought about attempting something like this?

What I envision is something that would potentially serve as a decentralized clone of Discord, with features like voice and video chat, text channels, stickers and emojis, customizable communities, etc.

Perhaps make each of the communities an instance, self-hosted by the instance owner(s).

Names for such a project could reflect its functionality or ethos, perhaps something like:
ActivityChat
SocialHub
MeshTalk

Or maybe a name that’s the complete opposite of “Discord,” such as:
Harmony
Concord
Rapport

Unfortunately, I don’t have the time, energy, or technical knowledge to start such a project myself, but I thought that this might be an interesting idea for the community to discuss or brainstorm.

Would this kind of platform fill a gap in the current Fediverse landscape?

What challenges do you think it would face?

Would it gain traction in the Fediverse?

  • toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Well, Matrix is all of that already, it uses its own protocol also called matrix, but its properly federated(unlike bluesky) and its open source. It also has a big userbase. The Matrix protocol is seen as a honorary member of the Fediverse. I think using activitypub may be a bad fit for real time messaging, so them using their own protocol makes sense. There are also XMPP server and clients, who do similar things to matrix, also federated and open source, however they are more like Whatsapp/Telegram etc.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      Does matrix have it’s own built-in video/voice group chats now? Last time I checked (several years ago) they were just using Jitsi for groups.

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Honestly, I don’t think it’s a good idea to say that fediverse == activitypub in the first place.

      IMHO all services that work in an open federated manner based on open federation standards are part of the Fediverse. Whether that protocol is AP, Matrix, XMPP or, yes, even Email; it’s all open standards where instances openly federate with other instances that implement the same standard.
      Hell, we could even bridge between protocols. Not saying it should but if Lemmy had a mailing list bridge, would you consider someone replying to Lemmy emails from their self-hosted email server as not being part of the fediverse?

      For the same reason I don’t consider AT to be part of the fediverse because it doesn’t operate in a federated manner as control is entirely centralised.

      • haverholm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I agree with your initial paragraph, certainly to the point that we shouldn’t focus on ActivityPub as some grand unifier or a goal in itself. It’s just the protocol that currently federates with the most different platforms.

        AFAIK some bridges from AP to other protocols currently exist, but we would really need to bridge (or somehow fully integrate) all the federated protocols you mention to talk about one fediverse. Whether it will be made possible through ActivityPub or some other protocol, that remains to be seen.

  • will_a113@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    24 hours ago

    ActivityPub is not a great fit for realtime chat. As others have noted, the Matrix and XMPP protocols are federated and designed for exactly this use case.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    24 hours ago

    ActivityPub is not very well suited for real-time communication, but there are some attempts like Sup.

    I think the best is to integrate an existing Fedivserse instance with XMPP. We do that on our slrpnk.net instance where every member automatically has a XMPP account reachable under the same address as on the Fediverse. We also host a Movim client that does chat as well as 1:1 A/V calls (group calls are coming soon).

  • hperrin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Email can work similar to Discord with mailing lists and chat apps like Delta Chat. Email is pretty awesome, but the big email services like Gmail and Outlook 365 are garbage.