Now that Benchy’s are off the market, what are your go to test models? I’ve seen Cali Cat and the torture toaster as examples.

  • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Since this licence has not been enforced for the past 7 years by Creative Tools (company that designed the orignal benchy), it’s probably safe to assume that it has something to do with NTI Group acquiring the company in march 2024…

      • nova_ad_vitum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        For a benchmarks designed to test printer performance, isn’t this a good thing? Allowing derivative works would allow a printer manufacturer to modify a benchy model to best suit their printer’s strengths, potentially defeating the purpose.

        It would be one thing to try to charge people for benchy, but that’s not happening. This sort of seems reasonable? Or am I wrong?

        • kn33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The problem is they’ve been going after parody derivatives. Think of someone taking it and putting arms on it, or putting Steamboat Willy at the wheel.

  • elDalvini@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Unpopular opinion: The license makes sense and should have been enforced from the start.

    The Benchy is a benchmarking tool, not just visually but there are also various features you can measure and check against the dimensions on the website. But that doesn’t work if the model you’re printing has been modified.

    If it looks like a beachy, it should have been printed from the original model, so it’s always comparable. Preventing derivatives means you can be sure of that, even if it came on the included SD card with your printer. Otherwise, manufacturers could include a modified model that makes their printers look better than they are.

    • nesc@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      There is nothing wrong with modifying the model to make it look better, printers print differently, end results look different. It would be a benchmark still, as in you obviously can print better, you just need to make necessary modificafions.

    • papalonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Just because the benchy was designed to be used as a calibration tool doesn’t mean people shouldn’t be able to do whatever they want with it. If a print a benchy with The Rock’s face on it I’m not gonna go to their website and be like “omg it looks different why???” Also the model is a solid 3d model, it isn’t presliced, so the only thing a manufacturer could do to make a benchy “look better” on their printer would be to make it visibly different than the original, which… See above.

      Like I get what you’re saying, standardization is important for tools like this, but if someone wants to calibrate their printer it’s not like it’s difficult to get the original benchy and run your test. If they were just removing models that are nearly identical but with small tweaks I’d be more likely to agree, but they’re removing artwork and gag models that could never be mistaken or passed off as the original.

      It’d be like banning children’s toys that look like tools because someone might try to build a house with a plastic ruler.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Yeah it also doesn’t mean the bench is dead or off the market, only that you have to use their model and cannot modify it.

  • technomad@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Interesting, but why wait until now to start enforcing this. (7 years apparently…)

    Seems like all it’s going to do is create disdain from the community.

    • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Creative Tools got bought by a large company called NTI Group in march 2024…they’re definitely the ones pushing for this sudden licence enforcement

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If you are a company in 2025 and you haven’t figured out how to make almost everyone completely fucking hate you, you are really lagging behind the times. They are playing catchup.

  • Voyajer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I don’t think I’ve ever printed a benchy in the first place. And I knew about its license from the beginning.