• Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    Are you aware rats and fleas are animals too? Humans and animals living close together is the reason viruses mutate. It’s why Europe had many plagues while the americas had none. As soon as Europeans landed there, we brought mayhem with all the viruses we brought with us. It’s because we domesticated animals, while in the americas they did not. We had many rats because of the poor hygiene and living so close together, with others and animals. We should make sure we distance ourselves from many different kinds of animals to reduce the chance or mutations.

    • remotelove
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Viruses mutate with almost every division. Hell, almost every strand of DNA that divides has mutations. It’s a natural phenomenon and not exclusively caused by one particular thing or situation.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutation

      You seem to be mixing up a few key aspects of how and why new strains are formed, and somehow, you are overestimating the transmissibility of a virus between different animals.

      It’s like you understand some of the key concepts of this stuff, but animal domestication somehow got mixed in as a root cause for natural processes.

      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 hours ago

        So you do not increase the chance of mutation onto other creatures by having animals and humans living close together? What is your point? You’re not saying anything different to what I’m saying. Viruses mutate, can jump from creature to creature. But when there are a lot of creatures living close together, it increases the chances. When there are a lot of different kind of creatures, there is a bigger chance of the virus mutating onto other type of creatures. Whether it’s lifestock, rats, insects, domesticated animals, whatever. When we talk about animal to human transmission, it’s called zoonosis.

        Scientists (microbiologists for example) warn for this all the time, especially since covid. Here in the Netherlands there are a lot of animals living very close to humans, with all the giant farms so close cities, increasing the mutation chance a lot. During covid nerts farms were closed because of this in several countries including Denmark and the Netherlands. They banned animal markets in China because of this. Because densely packed animals and many different kinds of animals increase the chance of mutation, and when close to humans, the chance of zoonosis increases drastically.

        So what am I mixing up here?

        Here are some scientific articles:

        https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2019.2736

        https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6787790/

        https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/03/240325114138.htm

        https://www.nature.com/articles/srep14830

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          You kinda keep jumping around regarding what your point is. First it was that caged animals caused all pandemics, and over time it has shifted to Europeans living close to animals caused all pandemics, and finally animals living close to humans caused all pandemics.

          Yes, close contact between animals will increase chances of mutations - but what are we supposed to do? If your point is “industrial farming is bad and increases chances of pandemics”, most people here would likely agree. But somehow you seem to be arguing that the black death was caused by people keeping rats and fleas in cages? Mixing your messages like this doesn’t help your point come across.

          • remotelove
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Yeah, I noticed that they were bouncing around quite a bit and stating some facts, but also drawing some wild conclusions from those facts. (It’s a lost cause trying to separate those two trains of thought, me thinks.)

          • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Thank you for changing what I said to something different you can attack me on. If only people would take me serious on my fight against fleas in captivity.

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I’m only trying to explain to you why you’re getting the responses you’re getting. Ignore me if you prefer that.

            • remotelove
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 hours ago

              It’s not an attack. You simply don’t stick with any point long enough to have a proper discussion.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Mmm yes that’s why explorers and colonists famously never got sick with diseases from the “New World”.

      Hides Malaria and Ebola under a rug.

      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Just because Europe was so packed with people and animals together so much more viruses mutated into plagues doesn’t mean other continents were immune to developing plagues. What is your point? You don’t agree living close with animals increases the chance of mutations? Or are you in favor of exotic animals in cages? Or do you deny Europeans brought loads of diseases to the Americas? What are you trying to accomplish here? All these things I wrote are scientific and historical facts.

    • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The Americas had less domestic animal species yes, but they had their own plagues, they just weren’t recorded.

    • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      On the flip side, every species that allowed itself to be domesticated is now at its highest population levels in all of history. There are more cattle, dogs, cats, chickens, sheep, etc alive today than ever before.

      Yes, there is disease that will jump species and that sucks but that’s just life, yo. Even with those that died from that, across all specific species in relation to man, every single species had and is still better off for the arrangement. The stories can be told in the sheer numbers alone.