• Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    No not at all. I’m saying despite that, there’s still nothing stopping someone from taking a car or a gun and killing someone with it.

    Edit: Downvoting this comment won’t make it untrue. There’s an example in the very article you just read.

    • solsangraal@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      by the “LaWs DoNt StoP cRiMiNaLs” logic, then we don’t need any laws at all, because whoever wants to is going to break them anyway. oh but of course the same chuds bleating this nonsense are also fighting tooth and nail to ram through bathroom laws. “only harming law abiding citizens” indeed

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Don’t lump me in with the trumptards. I voted Harris. I’m just stating facts.

        I have no doubt “the good christian” parents would have passed any gun laws or background checks you could throw at them.

        That little girl needed better parenting, mental healthcare and to not find a gun laying around.

        What new enforceable law could have prevented this?