• 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Rolling release and stable. And no systemd… not by choice though, they’re not purists, you just can’t build it for musl.

      • nesc@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Musl and stable is one worst word combinations there is. I still have nighmares from broken packages under alpine that worked just fine under normal distro. It took us like a week to find the problem. Bad times.

          • renzev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            It’s not their official policy, but my personal philosophy with alpine goes like this:

            1. If it doesn’t work with musl/busybox, find an alternative that does
            2. If I can’t find an alternative, then I patch it myself
            3. If I don’t have the time/skill to patch it myself, then I throw it into a container that has glibc/gnu coreutils