• DebatableRaccoon
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 days ago

    Where’s my shocked Pikachu face? Now just for these people to learn infinite growth also isn’t sustainable and we might finally be getting somewhere.

      • DebatableRaccoon
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 days ago

        It feels like the correct answer would be “no” but I honestly don’t know enough about Tencent to weigh in.

        • coyotino [he/him]@beehaw.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          the hard part is that they are partial investors in so many things. I believe they own the PUBG studio, which is the same studio that published Callisto Protocol, and that game had one of the largest budgets of all time. That’s the most obvious link I could find, but also that game came out a couple years ago so who knows, maybe they are steering the ship away from big budgets as we speak.

  • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 days ago

    Most games that are long are artificially so, with padded out content and grinding to advance. Short excellent games sell well. Huge expensive messes don’t.

    Just like movies, large blockbuster, high budget content can sell well but does risk sacrificing its soul and purpose. Occasionally one is both excellent technically, artistically and fun too.

    Or you can have smaller games with a more specific purpose which won’t sell as well. Some low budget games are bad. Some high budget games are bad. Neither is a mark of quality, they are just different ways of making games with different outcomes and purposes.

    Games need to turn a profit to be visible, so they should be looking at what’s the optimum way to spend their budget and make sales.

    As gamers, we should be rewarding good games, and avoiding microtransactions and all the upsells. I don’t buy any cosmetics or additional content (unless it’s a continuation of the game that makes sense as another chapter). I want to avoid that side of gaming as it doesn’t lead to good games. I pay full price at launch for my favourite game series, but not extra content. Other games I purchase later on sale.

  • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Does he think books should be shorter because the years of authors’ lives spent composing them are also not sustainable?

    I wonder if he’s aware that development budgets can be allocated in different ways, like paying good writers to make substantial (and long) stories, or refining the user interface and game mechanics so that they’re fun to play for a long time, rather than pushing every new hardware generation to its technical limits.

  • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 days ago

    Length has nothing to do with it. It’s all about the bullshit inflated budgets. They’re comes a point of diminishing returns with how many staff at working on a game, and how much is spent on marketing.