• Traister101@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 days ago

        Right, but the last attempt was falling apart within months of instillation with very light foot tragic and weather so…

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        in fairness to being fair, there have been multiple attempts, and every single time the results are extremely clear. Building an elevated solar shade using solar panels to both generate power, and cool down the walking/biking path. Is both more effective, and more practical.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    For fuck sake!

    Put solar on roofs, not where people walk/drive!

    Can we please stop wasting resources on this shit?

    • mPony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      23 days ago

      Can we please stop wasting resources on this shit?

      Not if some tech-bro can convince some gullible coked-up VC.

    • kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      Literally just put them 2 and a half meters higher so they provide shade for sitting on the bench instead of people shading the panels.

    • Troy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      This depends on what you’re optimizing for. If you are optimizing for total energy captured per square metre, then you’re right about the benches.

      But suppose you have a sufficient flux even with some areas being covered so you aren’t bothered by the shadows. Wouldn’t it be aesthetically superior to have uniform tile types? Or would you prefer they micromanage the tile placement such that the tiles below the bench shadows are different?

      Anyway, I think it is a good idea. Better than the silly solar roadways crap.

    • morbidcactus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      So you’re saying solar freakin benches is the answer???!!!‽

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      PV Magazine is more or less an outlet for press releases by companies trying to innovate (often in air quotes) with photovoltaics. I’m honestly not even sure why it’s allowed here; it’s completely uncritical. May as well cite a press release on the manufacturer’s website at that point instead of laundering it through a magazine.

  • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    We need more trees and green areas in cities to shade and cool them down, not more heat soaking open areas that heat them up!

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    23 days ago

    Just make covered walk ways. It’s only going to get hotter anyway. Give pedestrians shade to walk under.

  • Phoenixz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    24 days ago

    Oohh, solar roadways, part 4621559

    Trailer: they suck, don’t work, and are made by people who have no idea what the fuck they’re doing

  • humanspiral
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    It’s not that bad. Part of the appeal is having a black glass panel patio. A 30 year payback is ok, if it bails you out of a few power outages. Ok, its solar for rich people, but its still some clean energy.

  • BETYU@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    never use solar panels for side walks its a stupid idea. and there is a reason why solar panels are placed at angle and not flat on the ground.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    22 days ago

    oh good, yet another solar solution where you put solar panels underground, instead of like, building a pavilion and putting the solar panels on the top of it, where they would make more fucking power.

    • weew
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 days ago

      Nope, still solar roadways 1.0 again, they just hope that everyone forgot how crappy they are

  • bangupjobasusual@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    23 days ago

    Is it… lifting them 8’ off the ground that makes it impossibly expensive? Or maybe… the people in that area do not like shade?

    How complicated are the electronics to ensure that the voltage dip from one panel with a table sized shadow doesn’t drag down the whole array?