• Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Damn, we actually collapsed our environment in the name of profit. This must be the great filter. Its the enticing imaginary bullshit that leads to total obliteration over advancement. The chasing of made-up dragons to make some nonexistent number rise.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        7 months ago

        Ah, Cosmos, I remember watching that when I still believed people were creatures of knowledge and advancement. We’ll never know any of those things cause we spent the last 50 years prioritizing profit over all else. It didnt have to be like this.

          • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Just read it a couple of months ago and it was these little nuggets that kept hitting me hard leaving me like what’s-his-face when he saw the statue of liberty in planet of the apes. We had a nice thing going.

            • superkret@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              There’s also the argument that developing our civilization was only possible due to easy access to fossil fuels. We’ve now burnt all the easily accessible ones, so any future civilization won’t have them.

              We climbed up, burnt the step ladder behind us and are now jumping off the cliff.

    • Carvex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      I don’t believe planet self-destruction is the The great filter, just our filter and we failed. In all fairness it’s probably the first of many future filters that would have gotten us too.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    7 months ago

    The irony of filling up my screen with an advertisement as I try to read about what will be the collapse of our civilization is not lost on me.

  • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 months ago

    So, what does this all mean for us? It means we have even less time to get our act together. Reducing emissions isn’t just a good idea — it’s crucial.

    Our planet’s systems are interconnected in ways we’re only beginning to understand. If we want to keep things from getting worse, we need to act now. Every little bit counts, and the clock is ticking.

    In other words…we’re fucked.

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.worksBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Well, yeah.

      You were expecting maybe all of the countries of the world to absolve their differences and join hands to defeat the problems of climate change?

      Sounds kinda like a fairy tale.

      • FiveMacs
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 months ago

        We might be able to mitigate some of the effects of we start removing the actual problems people…granted the solution isn’t exact ‘legal’

        • floofloofOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I agree that it’s going to take popular action to prevent the capitalists from continuing as usual, whatever form this action takes. But it’s not going to happen until we’re organized and prepared to risk our own safety for the greater good.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        We’re likely to see a lot of suffering and disruption along with increased mortality, but humans are way too resourceful to go extinct, even with a severe disruption to the climate

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Maybe, depends on how uninhabitable the planet actually gets. We think we know what that looks like, but there are pretty wide error bars around the worst case scenarios.

          • Rolder@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Hmm, even if parts of the world become totally uninhabitable, this would also mean that other parts of the world will become more inhabitable. Usually arctic areas further away from the equator.

            So yes there would be a lot of death and suffering but I don’t think we’d go 100% extinct.

          • protist@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            There’s no climate scenario short of nuclear winter that renders the planet completely uninhabitable by humans though. We’re not facing a situation like The Road where the sunlight is completely blocked, killing every plant. Even with the worst case climate change scenarios, people are going to be able to find habitable areas and move plants to new regions where they will grow, or utilize technology to grow crops indoors, which already happens

              • protist@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                The word “uninhabitable” usually means whether humans can live there, and I specified I was talking about humans. The earth is not going to become completely uninhabitable by humans. I’m saying you’re wrong when you said “this is the last generation of humans on earth.”

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The trick to capitalism is to pay very close attention to who is asserting that it is a virtuous system. Not unlike the proper way to read a fortune cookie, one must add the phrase “for me” to the end of any such statement.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Great Britain will get more than chilly. Arable land was expected to drop from 32% of the region down to 22% by 2080, slashing their economy by a third. If the AMOC is already showing signs of breakdown, that timeline will need to be shortened.

    • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Life on Earth will be fine.

      There have been lifeforms that have survived multiple global extinction events over millions of years.

      Humans won’t. Which is why I stopped caring anymore about efforts to save ecosystems. Humans don’t deserve this planet and will righteously reap what we sow.

      Other life will go “Oh no, humans are gone… Anyways.”

      • 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Whales, Elephants, and the other Great Apes are all likely to go too, and they don’t deserve it. Humans brought this on ourselves, but the loss of peaceful intelligent life is a true tragedy.

  • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    Haha, I have no hope left. I might just keep playing league and trash talking my teammates. At least when my mind is filled with hate, the despair can’t creep back in :)

  • Jimmybander@champserver.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Surely the circulation will increase in power and shift to different places. The circulation of water isn’t going to just stop, right?

    • ILikeBoobies
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes, it’s this current that’s stopping

      Not water as a whole

    • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes, collapse here is a fear mongering term, because it makes you think the current will stop without actually saying the word “stop.” It’s just shifting. Changing. We are in the process of coming out of an ice age. Things gonna be moving.

  • 1SimpleTailor@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    About to be a total Doomer, but I would just like to remind everyone that the current effects we are seeing are due to carbon pumped into the atmosphere 30 YEARS AGO! And emissions have only increased since then.

    As a millennial, it’s been a hard reckoning that greed and evil truly won before I was born. There was nothing I could ever have done about it. All I can do is just ride it out. In a way, I am privileged. I’ve always had an interest in history, how fortunate I am to witness it’s end.

    • deus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      “This would bring big changes to the climate and ecosystems, including faster warming in the southern hemisphere, harsher winters in Europe, and weakening of the northern hemisphere’s tropical monsoons.”

      Short answer: no.

      Long answer: nope.