Was just watching Jack Ryan Season 3 and seeing the display of force and their movements causes some interesting dissonance given what we know now.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well how else do you justify maintaining defense spending at 5x the next biggest military? You need a boogeyman to keep the nation spending like WW2 never ended.

    Now I’m hearing there isn’t enough money for Medicare or social security…

    • OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was just thinking that as I was reading this post. Yeah, so they’re not “right behind the US” in overall ability and preparedness, and NOW they’re drained financially and their populations morale is at a low point with the drafts and the prisoner-units, who else do we have all these guns for then? Who will be the next boogeyman, and have we already laid the groundwork to say it’s China?

      • sheogorath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        The next boogeyman is definitely going to be China. But with their looming demography crisis, it’ll be quite unpredictable how’s the world geopolitical state going to be in 20-30 years. For all we know some country like India or Indonesia managed to solve their internal corruption and be a superpower.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Y’all seem to be forgetting the “axis of evil” — the justification conservatives used to double military industrial complex spending, the last time they faced cost cutting…

        Only a fool would disregard the formidable economic powerhouses of Iran, Iraq, and North Korea!

        TL;DR they have successfully manufactured boogeymen as needed. Realistic adversaries are unnecessary.