Yes I know, your least-favorite idea goes here. But seriously, someone must have come up with the concept before. Like a bad get-rich-quick scheme could fall into this category, where joining the scheme makes people lose money and become more desperate, so they become more likely to do desperate things like invest more in the scheme. But it can apply to a number of other bad ideas.

  • SGforce
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s the “sunk cost fallacy”

    • rational_lib@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sunk cost fallacy is definitely a subtype, but I’m going for I guess the more general concept of an idea that becomes more popular the worse it does

      • Donkter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t think it is a subcategory I think it’s the term you’re looking for.

        The actual phrase has its origins in a financial sense but the way it’s used nowadays is much more broad. You can invest time, money, emotion, identity etc and it’s still the “sunk cost fallacy” if it keeps failing and you keep going.

    • Hugin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Sunk cost fallacy is when you use previous expenditures to justify new expenditures so as not to “waste” the previous expenditure. It doesn’t imply the idea gets more popular like op is looking for.