I just saw a post complaining about the Mozilla layoffs.

I wanted to point out that the vast majority of their income (over 85% in 2022) is from having Google as the default search engine - Ironically, the anti monopoly lawsuit against Google will end this.

Expect things to get worse.

Please don’t assume it was just a cruel choice.

S1 S2

    • flux@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Where should they be “taking” funding instead?

      • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That’s the Mozilla paradox right there. A company like theirs cannot survive on the market without breaking their own ideals.

        • jcg@halubilo.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Serious question, is there actually a FOSS project out there at the scale of something like Firefox that survives on only donations?

          • Auli
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            No because people choose diss cause it’s free. I mean they might say other things but then the vast majority do not donate to anything. People are cheap and that’s why we are where we are with all the ads.

              • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                7 hours ago

                Corporate support of development, and I’m not just talking about Redhat and SUSE. Hell, Microsoft is a major contributor to the kernel.

      • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I don’t know. Crowdfunding? How does Thunderbird keep it self afloat? Maybe better integration of the community as in more say in what will be developed depending on how much money you donate etc.

        • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          That’s exactly the worst way to prioritize. Money should not be influence. That always works out worse in every example in the history of everything.

            • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              So it’s the default. Big deal. You can change that when you start the app first time. If that gets them funding that’s not a horrible price to pay. Also, that’s not money getting influence exactly, that’s a transaction. “We will pay $x to get this status.” Not the same at all as “I donated lots of money therefore I get to say how you develop the software.”

              • dino@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                I haven’t seen the contract between google and firefox.

                Maybe “how you develop the software” is a bit far-fetched, I was more thinking about decide where to put efforts into e.g.: continue developing Firefox’s core mechanic of being a privacy oriented webbrowser instead of… whatever they are doing with the funding they get.