Oh no.

  • El Barto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not happy with what’s happening and I know that corporations are money making evil machines.

    But to say that chip makers have no incentive at all to secure their hardware is quite the hyperbole.

    • Arghblarg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fair enough, probably was hyperbole :) But performance does seem to be a higher priority than security; they can always spin PR after the next exploit, after all, users already have the CPU in their system, they’ve made their money; what are users really gonna do if an issue comes up after they’ve bought their box?

        • whoareu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, but we live in cpu monopoly. Intel and Amd Both companies put backdoors and all sort of shit in their cpus.

            • Kodemystic@lemmy.kodemystic.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Im out of the loop with those. Are Arm and socs viable alternative for home computing?

              Last time I checked I could not build a pc with Arm. Post above is right intel and amd are dominating home user market.

              I have a macbook air m1 and this arm chips is imo just amazing. No fan no issues, fast as fuck. Id like to build a pc with arm. Maybe when Linux and windows show more support for arm64?

              • dack@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Linux supports ARM64 very well. Windows also has had ARM support for a quite a while. The main obstacles are 3rd party binary software (particularly on Windows) and lack of available hardware.