Your choice of browser matters — Google’s Web DRM and the open internet

https://grafcube.codeberg.page/blog/2023/08/06/web-drm-api.html

I wrote this blog post to inform the people I know who aren’t as tech savvy or otherwise don’t put any thought into their choice of browser. Another goal is to help get enough awareness on the topic and make sure it fails.

@opensource @privacy #webintegrityapi #WEI #google #mozilla #chrome #firefox #chromium #foss #opensource #OpenWeb #privacy #drm #nodrm #drmfree #freesoftware #browser

  • ZephyrXero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using Firefox as my primary on both desktop and mobile for about 6 years now, and it’s usually pretty great. Desktop rarely has problems. On mobile there are a good number of sites with issues though, because devs don’t usually test against it as has had a low number of users. But hopefully this revitalized movement to switch will make them have to care. And that said, 99% of the time these sites are still mostly usable, unless the broken thing is important like say a login screen 😅

    • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve only had like 1 issue on desktop in the last like 5 years. Mobile I’ve bumped into a few hiccups with forms, sliders, and other elements not working properly. If I can’t resolve the issue by requesting the desktop site I go to my computer or Chrome in an absolute emergency.

      That said, I’d take a (waaay) sub-1% failure rate any day in exchange for having the joy of uBlock Origin on my phone. If you’re on Android, I can’t recommend Firefox enough thanks to the add-on support.

    • El Barto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The opposite is true. A friend tells me some site is not working for them and they’re using Chrome. I open it on Firefox and yup, works fine.

      Of course, it’s way more serious when the site doesn’t work on FF.

    • Grafcube@fosstodon.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      @ZephyrXero Interesting. I’ve personally never had any problems on Android. I use Iceraven since it has more extensions and the only issue so far has been that initial load is often slow (because of the extensions I use).

    • Mpolmanteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have been using in desktop for about a year and it’s been great. I had tried mobile a while back and had some issues but with Google’s proposals I’m willing to try again.

  • BearPear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have been using Firefox since the release of Firefox 57 aka Firefox Quantum in 2017. I love the browser and most of sites run well in firefox. But there have been a few cases where I had to use a chromium based browser.

    Firefox + Ublock origin is a great and awesome combo.

    I also use Firefox on android. It is okay, but I sometimes feel it is slow at loading some sites. But it is not a big deal.

    • BearPear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, also Firefox is the only mainstream browser on Android that supports installing extensions.

      • Lemmy Reddit That@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        This. I switched to Firefox on Android, because of extensions. At the same time I switched to Firefox on Windows. And I never looked back. The only problem I have is native support for PWA on Firefox for desktops (we can add support with 3rd party app), and backgorund notifications doesn’t work on PWAs on Firefox for Android

        • panCatQ@lib.lgbt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Weird , I have been using ff , twitter pwa for years and notifs work for me , although i voluntarily disabled notifs now !

          • Lemmy Reddit That@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hm… It doesn’t work for me on my own app, where notifications are main part of the app. It does work on Chrome for Android and on both Chrome and Firefox on Windows, but on Firefox I never received a single notitication. And all notifications are enabled. I will try to remove and add PWA in firefox again and we will see. Is there some PWA app where I can test if notitications are working? I am not using Twitter.

            • panCatQ@lib.lgbt
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              There is a telegram pwa i think but i use the open source app for that !

  • Mindlight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Unfortunately this is coming and a majority of people are going to happily step on to the train.

    Think of it like this: 99% of all apps could have been just web apps in a mobile browser (Hell, a majority essentially are just a wrapped web app) but because of companies offering more/better functionality people choose to use the app.

    All that needs to happen is sites starting require DRM functionality for “security reasons” so that the end user can enjoy more features.

    A majority of end users don’t understand the implications when making choices like these.

    • Grafcube@fosstodon.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Mindlight but it hasn’t happened yet. Getting everyone to switch away from Chrome isn’t going to help anyone and that’s why there needs to be legal action.

      • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.mlM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It will because websites will not drop support for 20% of users, they might if it is 3%. This is how product owners make decisions on browser support.

      • panCatQ@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think its bit late for awareness campaigns now , google will eventually bring the web integrity api , I am very scared about if we will even be able to use new OSes , but i guess a new web with less dependancy may develop !

  • ferralcat@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was in dehi recently. Poverty is kinda nuts there, but I noticed everyone had phones, even people who obviously had no home. I assume kinda shitty phones, but it makes you realize a bit how important access is. If someone releases an iOS only app with no web version, they’re basically saying fuck you to all those people.

    Same same for this though. Googles saying “as long as you use our stuff you’ll be fine, and why wouldn’t you use our stuff because it’s free! (Sometimes kinda sorta). And if you’re stuck with something else for some reason, fuck you.”

  • Sky Cato@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Sure, Chromiums code is available and you can modify and redistribute it. But if you want to send your changes to the main project so that more people may benefit from it, it is ultimately Google’s decision. This is the problem with projects that are not community-run.”

    Google is asshole. This shows than NOT all open source codes are free as in freedom. Stallman is right.

  • mishimaenjoyer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    @grafcube it’s very important to push back against google’s browser hegenomy just like we did back in the day with microsoft because now it’s not just about one company controllin the software to access the majority of the web but the privacy of it.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This new invention from Google has nothing to do with the browser you use. It is an API incorporated into, with Google affiliates and its own, web pages, which allows these pages to block any browser “for security reasons”, when it does not have a Google Token incorporated, that accredits it as secure. That is, it is then Google itself who decides which browser is worthy to access the web. It doesn’t matter which browser you use, or incorporate this Token in it, or forget about a large part of the internet and anyway about any Google page or service (Gmail, YouTube, GDrive, GoogleMaps, …). This is the danger that the free internet faces, that Google decides which browser is worth using and which is not, being able to allow only Chrome itself as the only valid browser to access half of the pages on the network, and Game over for everyone else, Chromium, Gecko, WebKit or any other, without Google Token in it no internet, except if some geek comes up with some Fake Token which can be used (complicated)🤬.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For the downvoters, also Firefox and forks need to insert this Google Token in the Browser or die. Because of this Mozilla, Vivaldi and several others have started a protest before the legislator to prevent this crap. In the EU there is already a debate whether or not this is compatible with GDPR and user rights. We’ll see what comes of this. It is legitimate that Google provides tools to web pages to protect against entries from bots and insecure browsers, but it is not legitimate that the decision which browser is secure and which is not, depends on this company, only a certificate from an independent technical institution can be valid on technical grounds and not by Google itself for possible commercial reasons.

    • tacticaltweaker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was using Brave’s engine for awhile but I feel like its results were getting worse. Went back to my own SearXNG instance, it’s pretty polished these days.

      • panCatQ@lib.lgbt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did they change stuff ? I was running an instance on my home server , but the server ceashed and didnt get time to reinstate it !

        • tacticaltweaker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Compared to a few years ago the UI, especially on mobile, looks super nice. Also they added Lemmy support built-in very recently if you use the latest commits.

          • panCatQ@lib.lgbt
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I generally take a pull from their git and build it on my machines so yeah !

  • Midas@ymmel.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah I’m completely over to firefox now. I can’t help but notice firefox mobile is still a bit sluggish though but eh

  • Mr. w00t@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Good article actually! I think non-tech-savvy people will also appreciate some kind of TL;DR

    Edit: didn’t know Codeberg can host static sites, definitely migrating mine there from Guthib!

  • gram@fosstodon.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    @grafcube @opensource @privacy

    > But why do you use Chrome?

    I can tell why I do. I used to use Firefox but had to move to Chromium long time ago for several reasons:

    1. It was nicer on RAM on a very small machine I had at the time. I think Firefox got better in that sense since then.

    2. Many web apps don’t work quite well (or don’t work at all) on anything but Chrome. That’s a sin many lazy web developers make, and it forces their choice on the users.

      • cmhe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        To the second point, as a avid firefox user, I noticed that some Webapps seem to not depend on the Browser alone.

        Even in safe mode, some Webapps sometimes work better on different systems than on others using the same Firefox version.

        For instance youtube streaming seem to work better on my Linux laptop then on my Windows desktop, where it becomes stuttery. In Chromium there it works as well as Firefox on my Laptop.

        What I want to say is that browsers and all the systems around this are very complicated. So your milage with the same browser will vary, and you might blame the wrong thing.

      • whoareu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        By just changing user agent string you can make the site work on Firefox too!

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          True for many cases. But I was referring to cases in which the site really acts out because it’s optimized for Chrome.

      • this_is_router@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        After using Firefox for 20 years, aside of maybe 3 times I never had any problems. So I can’t confirm the second point at all