• BlameThePeacock
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    PR never benefits the current government, so implementing it is very unlikely to ever happen despite how much better it would be.

    • Sunshine OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That is a defeatist attitude by someone who is against electoral reform.

      The powerful few cannot ignore a general strike in favour of PR to be passed without a referendum through multiparty support.

      • BlameThePeacock
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I voted in favour last time, didn’t help because the government intentionally sabotaged it.

        There will never be a general strike over this issue, it’s not nearly problematic enough when 40% of people are still getting the party they voted for.

        • Sunshine OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You should be supportive of PR if you voted in favour and demand better from our establishment officials from BCNDP and BC Conservatives.

          • Pyr_Pressure
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            You can be supportive of PR while also admitting what the current reality is

            I am supportive of universal income, taxing the 1% up the ying yang, and a whole lot of stuff that will likely never happen. Just because people admit the reality of something doesn’t beam they don’t support it.

            • Sunshine OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              That’s what the powerful few want you to think

  • Lauchs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Goodness no, things would be even worse!

    Many PR systems end up having a variety of smaller single issue parties. Our system has flaws but it tends to produce majority governments to which it is easy to ascribe blame as well as praise.

    In a coalition of 4 differenr parties as government, whom should be blamed for what gets really difficult.

    For a practical demonstration, look at Israel which is conducting an unpopular war in part because Netenyahu is beholden to a small group of extreme right wing parties to maintain power.

    • Sunshine OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Stop fearmongering about a fairer system that increases voter choice and accountability in politics.

      Israel’s situation is very complicated and is a terrible comparison to make.

      You’re forgetting about what is happened in Zimbabwe. First past the post still produces extremists parties such as the B.C. conservatives and US republicans.

      People can easily tell if 4 political parties screw up in government. It is classist and quite insulting to be assuming the public cannot handle more than 3 political parties.

      Denmark uses pr and they’re one of the strongest democracies in the world.