• HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Why would you us a bow? Range is poor, and lethality is also low, esp. with the access the the ultra-wealthy have to medicine. When you hunt deer with a bow, you can usually expect to have to follow a blood trail, as it’s rarely an instant drop.

    Use a .300 Winchester magnum from 1000 yards; at that distance, you still have about 850 foot-pounds of energy, which is roughly double a 9mm at point black range. With the right ammo, that’s more than enough to get the job done. You probably want a combined mechanical and ammunition accuracy of about .5 MOA range though, so that you have deviation of less than 6" at that range. It’s a challenging shot, but it’s definitely doable if you know your holds and can call the wind.

  • Underwaterbob@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I get the violent rhetoric, I really do. But, at the same time, I can’t help but feel like more people would be more amenable to social reform that benefits the little guy to the mere detriment of the rich, rather than murdering them horribly. I could be wrong, but doesn’t history teach us that violent revolution more often just begets more violence than actually solves problems?

    • dyc3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      I agree 100%. I’m as left as probably most people here, but I just don’t understand why the first course of action is to claw the opps eyes out.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Ok but the rich, and tgerefore powerful will block said reform or even weaponize it. We’re at 40 years of losses for the little-guy. We’re down to the bone and they’re still cutting while the pigs still feed at the public through

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      but doesn’t history teach us that violent revolution more often just begets more violence than actually solves problems?

      Nope! Look at the life expectancy increases under socialist countries, they mathematically have less death!

      Also compare red terrors casualty numbers to standard operating casualty numbers. Like 20 million people die of capitalism caused deprivation a year worldwide today.

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I loathe this runaway capitalist system we live in just as much as the next but this violent rhetoric is getting a bit too spicy. Let’s tax the owning class into oblivion. Take away their undeserved wealth and make them work for a living like the rest of us. Riot and rebel if our lives depend on it. But these calls for the outright slaughter of other human beings are going too far.

    • BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      The owner class wrote the rules and will never give up one iota of power. If we want positive change, meaningful progress, it won’t be from working within the system.

      History only teaches one lesson and it teaches it very plainly: no progress is made without bloodshed. The blood of the worker class has already been spilled, millions of times over.

    • zeroday@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Capitalists can choose to give up their property and become workers like the rest of us, or they can get the wall and then their property is redistributed. The capitalist class has colonized our society, and their enforcers are the police. And according to Franz Fanon’s books on anticolonial struggle in Algeria, colonial relations never go away unless fought with anticolonial violence to oppose the violence of the colonizers. Ultimately, violence is what is needed to force those in power to give up their wealth, and if they gave up their wealth willingly then violence would not be necessary.

  • Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Lol!

    This fantasy you people have is nothing but sociopathy.

    What “rich” are you trying to kill and eat? Just, anyone that you have judged to have more than you have? It’s not like you will be able to get to the people at the very top. And what, you just murder those that you have labeled “rich” along the way?

    My brother makes more than I do. MUCH MORE. I would never want to see him and his family murdered by douche bags out of jealousy for the things he has been able to work hard to achieve. And he has worked hard all of his life to make it to where he is now!

    Do you guys have some sort of test to see who should and shouldn’t be murdered just because they have more than you do?

    You guys are fucking sick in the head!

  • SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 day ago

    Feel like your chances of seeing one of the dozens of people who hold like half the wealth in the world is pretty slim on the street.

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t think that particular game is hunted on the streets.

    They have meticulously maintained resorts, islands, megayachts, etc for exact purpose.

    It’s no proper sport tho, once the staff stops protecting them, they just stand there sucking their thumbs.

    But it’s still fully worth it, once the kill is done & the empire (for at least a moment) falls, nature can’t believe what just finally happened, etc.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean, historically speaking un-tactical raids (pitchforks & torches) worked, however they did buy up a lot more police/military personnel since then.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    I just rewatched some Hawkeye episodes. I’m down with this. brb got to make some more special arrows.

        • cowardsgfy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          we’re not going to pay him because he didn’t farm it. we’re going to pat the robot on the head. we’re going to do R&D and implement the technologies that actually work for the people not the few.

        • SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          if money is not existent at this point, i will, as mentioned in my original comment, exchange it for something else, be it other goods, or my services as a mechanic, electrician, metal worker, or IT-support (yes i know, kind of an outlier)

  • MissJinx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not against but I feel like we have to establish boundaries. Like how rich is rich game? Is a weathy dude huntable? What about people that won the lotery? I Imagine billionaires are the better target right?!

    • cowardsgfy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      it’s not about vengeance. it’s about toppling the figureheads that gatekeep the means to the utopia within reach.

      how many have to die? i guess as many as it takes until we see progress.

    • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      As with any hunt, the biggest ones are the most impressive. Nobody’s going to commend you for taking down a scrawny one when there are billion point bucks out there.

      • MissJinx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        So it’s like the purge but with points or is it like the french revolution?! (Not that they are were very different lol)

        Just want to make sure of the rules so I don’t kill my neighbour accidentally

  • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t know. Personally I’m a fan of Piyu style reeducation (or at least a more modern and humane version of it).

  • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    You’re only allowed to have post-nut clarity in capitalism if you have earned a lot or better yet once you have a stable passive income. Otherwise, it’s money-horney talking in you.

    And most of the days that’s what lemmy sounds like “I never had sex, this attractive guy has slept with too many girls, we gotta make sure there’s an equal distribution of girls among all of us”.

    We can still talk about how that situation is unfair, but you’ll never convince me that you’re neither jealous nor horny.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      This is vibes based politics.

      No, an exploited class noticing their exploitation and some dude thinking he is entitled to having sex with women are not the same actually.