• Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    The central project of open-source community closes doors to people based on nationality, and everyone is cheering…

    Why? You seriously miss the implications of breaking the very basic principles of open source? You are ready to forgive literally anything if it is claimed to target Russia or Russians in any way?

    For those of you who say about backdoors:

    • US is known to create the most complicated spy networks with myriads of backdoors. Where are the bans of the US maintainers?
    • Israel is a literal powerhouse of state-sanctioned spying software - Pegasus, as well as many less renowned programs, was created here. Any bans, anyone?
    • China is known for invasive software. Maybe ban them all too?

    The only reasonable way to avoid backdoors is to meticulously check the submitted code. Threat actors can be anywhere - and Russia is not some unique threat location, nor was it banned with that justification - just “compliance requirements”.

    This is politics permeating the sacred place we all had. This is a giant threat to the community, and the way Linus framed it in his message is even more terrifying. This was never meant to happen.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      The only reasonable way to avoid backdoors is to meticulously check the submitted code.

      Which is the job of maintainers. Which now aren’t Russian, any more. To the best of my knowledge the kernel is still accepting code from Russian citizens, ultimately not having Russians in maintainer roles isn’t going to stop the FSB from infiltrating the kernel but it certainly does make it harder.

      This also isn’t in any way a judgement on the removed people, it’s just that it so happens that if you’re a Russian citizen you’re quite vulnerable to wrench attacks. You could even say that the kernel org is protecting them from being used like that.

    • FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m actually shocked by how people are acting about this.

      You see, it’s actually a really bad thing to ban devs from an open source project based on nationality over all else. “Oh, but they are state actors!!!” How do you know? Because they are Russian?

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Exactly! Being Russian doesn’t mean having any political affiliation.

        Moreover, even Russia the state is adopting Linux and is greatly disinterested in messing it up. If anything, this could really be the attack on Linux-reliant Russian infrastructure, but even then it most likely will be a reason for a fork, no more, no less.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Torvalds responses make clear he has spent too much time with the wrong people. Calling everyone paid actors is such an embarrassment to his own intelligence. When the linux kernel starts falling behind because of a lack of competent maintainers after banning any country that NATO isnt friends with, we will know that this is where it started and that people cheered.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, arguing that everyone disagreeing is a paid Russian troll is a cherry on top.

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          57 minutes ago

          So you think Russian trolls wouldn’t want to spin this narrative? By virtue of what? Honor?

          • Allero@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            35 minutes ago

            No, I just say that writing down any disagreement to the evil intentions of someone in power is extremely counterproductive.

            There is plenty of people who are in sincere disagreement over this decision, and Linus just tries to silence them. This ain’t alright and leads to direct abuse of power.

            This is literally a chapter of an authoritarian playbook.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        True, but it seems like they were mostly united by just having Russian e-mail domains. Some also worked on support for Baikal CPUs, but they are essentially a failed product now.

        Also, the personal response of Linus is a clear F*** you to Russians in particular, so he kinda cleared this out, at least on the level of “I don’t give a damn about Russians whatsoever, they’re evil”