We’ve been anticipating it for years,1 and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the …

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    Also Firefox mobile has nearly all of the extensions as the desktop version so it’s more similar across all of your devices. Personally, I use LibreWolf on desktop and Mull on mobile, but they’re just tweaked versions of Firefox with some bloat and telemetry removed and preconfigured to be more private.

  • funkforager@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    You can make a windows registry change to have Chrome let you keep using uBlock Origin, with the V2 manifest. It will buy you six more months, basically the enterprise support period.

    There was a handy shortcut created by the Security Now podcast you can use as a one-click file to update the policy. The show notes also give a more detailed breakdown of what’s going on.

    The relevant section in the notes is page 10. The link to the file is page 12. https://www.grc.com/sn/sn-995-notes.pdf

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    After i uninstalled chrome some time ago, i noticed it had been slowing down my entire system even when its not on. There is nothing of worth in using it or any other browser derived from it.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    You can always keep Chromium installed for the odd site that doesn’t work in Firefox (my daily driver). I do web development and test in every browser and I almost never encounter sites or features that don’t work in FF. The only one I can recall is something in the Azure Portal, probably because Microsoft wants you using Edge.

    Typically, Safari is the laggard and any developer worth their salt would make sure their site works on iPad and iPhone. When a new web standard is released, usually Chromium supports it first but even then, not always. And web developers usually don’t use features that aren’t implemented across the board yet. I know I go to caniuse.com before I use something fresh out the oven.

    • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If a site requires chrome, it doesn’t require me. If I need it for work, I’ll use Edge instead.

    • Num10ck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      be sure to check out the extensions, there’s several that are game changers.

    • AlternateRoute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      No, HVEC / H.265 codec support so no modern 4K security camera or plex/jellyfin etc high quality video support.

      • vividspecter@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        45 minutes ago

        Jellyfin

        Use the desktop client or jellyfin-mpv-shim and you’ll get HEVC support and superior image quality.

      • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 hours ago

        According to caniuse.com, it works now in the Nightly builds and can be enabled in other builds via the media.wmf.hevc.enabled pref in about:config.

        I use Firefox Dev Edition and I think it’s enabled there. But either way, you can enable it on stable.

        • AlternateRoute
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Night, windows only, and needs to be enabled with about: config… ie it almost has some support maybe. Also doesn’t work via webrtc so it doesn’t actually help me with the viewing the security cam feeds.

            • AlternateRoute
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 minutes ago

              Core web app compatibility vs … “enhanced” ad blocking. MS teams and some other business tools also don’t support Firefox but work fine in Chrome and Safari.

              It is something the Firefox team needs to work on again. I used Firefox from when it was released until Chrome came out and mopped the floor with it. At the time Firefox became the bloated beast and went through a reset.

              Unfortunately trying to have a firm stance on not implementing HVEC when they no longer had the largest market share was a bad move and they seem to be slowly back tracking on that.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        plex/jellyfin etc high quality video support

        H265 isn’t the only option there. AV1 is great and fully supported by Jellyfin (and I imagine Plex?)

        • AlternateRoute
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          H.265 is the defecto standard on Security cameras, and I am not going to migrate content to AV1 that is already in H.265.

            • AlternateRoute
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Not when you are using an NVR with scrubbing and everything in the web UI. https://frigate.video/

              All in all it would be an inconvenient workaround for something that already works seamlessly across Safari, Edge, Chrome etc.

                • shinratdr
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  43 minutes ago

                  How is giving a sober and straightforward explanation of why he can’t use Firefox “bitching”? The simple fact is “switch to Firefox” isn’t a solution for everyone in every case. Burying your head in the sand about that benefits nobody.

          • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Jellyfin can handle the transcoding to AV1 where needed. Albeit that’s a bit less ideal than direct play as you need the hardware to transcode.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    We kept Firefox alive for you all these years. You’re welcome.

  • helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I hope Lina Kahn goes after them for this BS. They have a monopoly on the browser market and they’re exploiting that to further their own interests in the advertising industry.

    • sue_me_please@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 hours ago

      This isn’t sufficient. I’ve been running DNS adblocking for a decade, advertisers have wised up to it and can easily sidestep it.

    • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 hours ago

      To my knowledge, DNS blockers not only miss a ton of ads, they also trigger several false positives.

      A better solution is to switch to something not chromium like Firefox or whatever alternative the next Linux person to read this comment recommends

  • csm10495@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I still hope as part of the antitrust ruling, they rip chrome from Google and undo this crap.

    I’ve had good luck with uBlock Lite.

    (Yes I could swap browsers but nah).

  • dadarobot@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Honest question here, since chromium (vs chrome) is open source, can someone not fork an older version, or remove the new code blocking ublock?

    I mean i assume it cant be done, but i dont know why

    • 4z01235@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It can be done, but then whoever forks that will need to stay on top of keeping that fork up to date with other changes in the original chromium, and that gets harder and harder to do as time goes on and more changes are made to the same or related parts of the codebase.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        10 hours ago

        And you have to know that if anyone actually tried, they would dedicate their infinite resources to making that as difficult as humanly possible.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Google: We changed a color

          Fork Developer: they changed a color and it caused 50,000 breaking changes that a diff tool can’t handle automatically wtf.

          Google: sorry wrong color here’s a new one

          Fork developer: another 100,000 breaking changes that a diff can’t handle?!?!

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I don’t know why either. What I do know is that most Chromium browsers that are not Chrome have ad-blocking built into the browser itself using the same strategies as uBo but not reliant on Mv2 or Mv3 because they’re not extensions.