I think it’s getting time to start research to replace my aging Synology, what’s good in the marketplace right now?

I’ve a DS 1513+ which has served us well but given the age of the disks I’m thinking build a replacement and mirror it, then archive the old HDDs as a backup.

We also have a Terramaster unit that’s pure junk, but that’s used for non-critical archival data. Only Unraid saves it from the recycler.

DS1522+ or is the 16- or 18-series worth the extra? Or is there something better for the money? The old 15-series has been rock solid, are the modern units as good?

  • HutchOPEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    I’m half tempted to buy a 4u rackmount case and pack it with disks but I know that time tinkering should be time working and earning. DSM does have value, as far as 6.2 - I’ve not seen v7 yet and not bold enough to install it on an elder unit.

    • btobolaski@threads.ruin.io
      2·
      1 year ago

      As always, it depends on use case and needs. For my use case (hot storage for vm disk and stateful kubernetes workloads) Truenas Scale doesn’t require any tinkering. Just install it and configure the storage, networking, and shares. The latter of which is currently completely handled by a kubernetes operator. This is about equivalent effort to Synology but with a much less user friendly interface.

      For more than a storage target, I wouldn’t really recommend it. It does have “Apps” but the setup is semi-involved and does leak some of the implementation details. You can also run vms but the experience is much worse than a dedicated hypervisor.

      So, I have both for different purposes. I wouldn’t want to put my hot storage on Synology because the hardware is pretty expensive and gets really expensive to get the features I would need (10gb and likely more ram to support the workload) but it’s pretty good for bulk storage and the app platform is fine for the supported things.

      So, I’d say that a new Synology is probably best for you. I upgraded from a DS1513 to the the DS1821+ and the improvement is nice. I would recommend you get more bays than you need as it makes gradually increasing your storage smoother with SHR. If you use SHR, SHR-2 is the one to use as a failure during rebuild isn’t exactly unlikely with similar drives. Since that requires a 4 drive minimum of a particular size to make the space usable, 5 drives is pretty limiting in terms of incrementally upgrading.