• UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    I just moved to Michigan

    I have never seen a group of drivers so committed to Tail Gateing … Like it’s the state sport

  • 1hitsong@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’ve always followed the rule of 1 car length for every 10 miles per hour you’re going.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      44 minutes ago

      I always (sometimes) do three seconds between me and the car in front of me. That automatically adjusts for increased speed.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I have a two lane road for most of commute every morning. What hate is when you pick up a buttplug. A buttplug is some dipshit who crawls up your ass and refuses to pass. They wont leave enough gap for the person behind them to pass without passing both of us and they wont pass themselves.

    What is crazy about this is that person will usually stay there until every car behind them has passed. After that they usually pass almost immediately.

  • bluewing@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    49 minutes ago

    It’s a nice thought, but it has so many modifiers it’s pretty much worthless. Everything from road conditions, to time of day or night, to the size and weight and type of vehicle you are driving, to how old you are affects stopping distance and the interval you should be leaving.

    Remember children - Driving should never be “relaxing.” It’s real work and demands your total concentration to protect yourself and everyone around you. So put the phone down and even turn off the radio. Put your head on a swivel like a fighter pilot. And have an escape plan for every inch you drive.

  • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I think my biggest pet peeve about driving is when you come to a stop and the car behind you tries to shove their nose up your ass. Like bruh you don’t need to ever be that close

    • desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      if they are following the two second rule they should be less than a foot from your car. If your car is stopped you are always more than two seconds from the car in front of you.

      • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        So you can hit the car in front of you too?

        It’s not only a safety hazard but it leads to slower traffic. If you maintain the right distance at a stop the whole line of cars can accelerate faster because you don’t have to wait as long for the car ahead of you to move. There are zero actual benefits of sniffing my ass at a stop.

          • AstralPath
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Weird guy is right though. Best practice is to leave enough space so that in the event you get rear ended you don’t get shoved into the car in front of you.

    • Zombie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      “Only a fool breaks the 2 second rule.”

      I was taught to repeat that phrase, at a normal steady pace, when I saw the back of their car go past something, to use as a marker (a signpost, the end of one of the lines on the road, whatever).

      If you finish the phrase after the front of your car has gone past the same marker, then you don’t have a big enough braking distance and need to ease off a bit.

  • lohky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    My car’s “smart cruise control” leaves what seems to be around a car length for every 10 mph, which is what I remember hearing in driving school. Feels a bit excessive in practice, but I also never feel like I’m being an asshole so I’m okay with it.

    • cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I was rear ended, HARD once. That distance gave me the space to control both my vehicle, and the one that hit me. It turned a potential multi car, multi lane pileup into a 2 vehicle wreck, either 1 more dinged car.

      The space isn’t for the 99.999% of the time, but that 0.001% OH FUCK time.

  • Ravi@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The simplified distance rule we learn in europe is: half your speed (km/h) in meters or as an equation, v/2000. E.g. you drive 120km/h, keep 60m distance.

    • MeatsOfRage@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’ve always preferred the 2 second rule. You don’t need to do distance math in your head, just find a tree and count the time it takes to get from their car to yours.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        In my country it’s 3 seconds out of town and 2 seconds in town, by law. And I think that’s beautiful.

    • faercol@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      In France the way we learned is (for the highway at least)

      • 110km/h: 5 small markings between you and the other car
      • 130km/h: 2 large markings
    • toynbee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      In the US, usually it’s one car length per 10mph.

      Probably not much more intuitive than yours, but less math required on the fly.

      • Ravi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Tbh the math required is pretty similar, I just divide the speed by 2 and am done.

        • toynbee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          That’s very reasonable if you’re accustomed to operating in metric … Which we all should be, but here we are.

            • toynbee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Ah, that could be interpreted at least two different ways. I have a suspicion of how this conversation will go, but I’m interested to find out.

              It’s my opinion that the metric system is superior to the imperial, so we should all be primarily exposed to the superior system. Some may disagree and I won’t claim that I’m objectively correct. No worries if you disagree - regardless of my opinion, the imperial system is what I’ve been exposed to and what I use.

              Alternatively, the statement might be interpreted as “you should be familiar with the metric system even if you reside in a country where it’s not the primary system.” That’s probably less true - while it might behoove one to be familiar with the metric system, I don’t blame the individual for the limitations placed on them by the government, regardless of what’s better.

              If you have a third interpretation, it’s probably not what I meant, but I would be interested in hearing it.

    • Cagi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I just leave enough room to come to a stop in the gap between us.

      • Ravi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s the underlying reason to keep distance ofc. The rule of thumb gives you an easy to calculate solution to how far that approximately is.

        • Cagi
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I don’t need math for this. Once you have a feel for your car you can just visually gauge it in an instant.

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    When I leave two car lengths, four cars will go into it, and at least one of their drivers will throw a half empty beer can at me.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I tend to annoy people by dropping off the gas much sooner for lights than strictly necessary, but by gently slowing I both save gas, wear and depending on the timing of the light I can often even time it to miss the red entirely

  • IMNOTCRAZYINSTITUTION@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    11 hours ago

    nothing gets me more pissed off than when I’m driving the speed limit on an open road with an open passing zone, no one coming towards me or ahead of me, and some dipshit decides to ride my ass

    • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Or you’re in the right hand lane and people are still tailgating you even though you’re going 70mph.

      Some people are unnecessarily aggressive on the road. Probably because they have unresolved emotional issues and take it out on other drivers. At least that’s what I tell myself.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Then you need to lift off the accellerator, don’t brake check or anything, just slowly slow down.

      If the car behind you won’t give you enough safety margin to maintain a high speed, then your only option to maintain safety is to reduce your speed so that the safety margin they give you is enough to stop in time for an accident.

      Here in Sweden we have plenty of roundabouts, I will use those to also get rid of annoying drivers who just can’t manage their distance, if I have someone like that behind me when I get to a roundabout, I just drive a full lap of the roundabout and let them pass.

      I will allways let these guys past when I can, they are in a rush to their own accident, and I am not, let them pass and and make them stop being my problem, if I can’t find a place to let them pass I will reduce my speed to compensate for their lack of safety margins

        • stoy@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It isn’t even a justification, it is simple defensive driving, as I was taught in driving school, and reenforced by my dad many times.

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If you’re only two lengths away from the car in front of you while driving at highway speeds, you are tailgating. Back off. It’s far more dangerous than speeding.

    • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      At 65mph, you cover two car lengths (~30 ft) in about 1/3 of a second.

      Typically human reaction time for braking is about 1.5 seconds.

      If something went seriously wrong in front of you (like a sideways car, or a hidden obstacle in front of the car in front of you) you would have covered 10 car lengths before your foot touches the brake pedal.

    • Tony N@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Help me out with this, because it’s driving me crazy. Whenever I leave anywhere close to 2 seconds between me and the car on front of me, someone cuts in, and I’m now too close to them, so I slow down, leaving a 2 second gap, and another cuts in. Rinse, repeat. I end up being the slow ass that everyone keeps zooming around unless I tailgate.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Just… Don’t care? Let people in and adjust the distance with them. Driving is an involved process, get a car with adaptive cruise control if you want one that will do exactly that for you.

        • Tony N@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I guess it’s more than just “caring” - I feel that we’d all be a lot safer if we were all going the same speed instead of inviting people to dodge in and out

          • kmaismith@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            45 minutes ago

            It would be safer if we were all riding the train/bus. Getting in a car in america is accepting the risk that you share the road with everyone. no matter the qualifications or mental state we still all gotta get to work/grocery store/wherever, and the only way is by ~4000 pound metal speed box.

            Worrying about safety on the highway is about making sure you are in situations you can handle and react to, staying attentive to the styles and mental states of other drivers and being a step ahead of the road conditions

            • Tony N@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 minutes ago

              Unfortunately I can’t see how public transport would be feasible without accepting that the vast majority of places I might want to go are simply inaccessible, and the places I could go would take 3-5 times longer. Case in point, there are no public transportation options to get to my son’s high school. It would be a 35 minute bicycle ride. I can drive there in 12 minutes. Getting to my local Wegmans would take 37 minutes by bus. I can drive there in 9 minutes. I live on the outskirts of a medium size city on the east coast in a low density residential neighborhood.

      • MeatsOfRage@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Let them hop in and keep your 2 seconds. I used to have a 40 minute commute and on a busy morning would have 10-15 people do that. Know how much time that sets me back? 20 to 30 seconds. Following this rule I have a 25 year clean driving record and I guarantee these lane hoppers can’t make that claim

        • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          it’s probably even less, maybe even negligible because of traffic lights at either end: you can’t calculate a single journey because you’re never going to hit the same light exactly the same every time. I have four lights between my house and the freeway, and 7 between the freeway and one of the sites for my job. Each one adds between 0-60 seconds randomly for an average of 6 minutes sitting and waiting per day. I would have to have a commute of like 120 miles of uninterrupted freeway driving for that to matter.

      • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It just be that way. Idiots will see your safe following distance as their opportunity to switch lanes. Just keep being the safe one.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The gap you leave should be speed-dependent and about 2 seconds to allow for reaction time. Yes, this caps the highway’s capacity to 0.5 cars per second per lane but roads are inherently inefficient.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      3 seconds is the guideline I’ve been taught here in Sweden, but yeah. Riding too close is crazy dangerous and I don’t understand why people keep doing it.

    • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I was taught to look when the car in front drives past a landmark like a lamppost, then say to myself “Only a fool breaks the two second rule”

      If you pass the lamppost before you finish saying it, you’re too close

      • Sharp312@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This is the only good answer. No need to distract yourself by figuring out your speed and guesstimating your gap like others are saying. Just count the seconds whenever you need to

    • BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Aye, and 2 seconds is the bare minimum. A company I have worked for wanted 4 seconds between you and the car in front. That always felt a little much, but it definitely helped prevent wrecks.

      • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        In my state, it’s one car length(15-20 feet) for every 10mph. Good luck getting anyone to actually follow it though! Getting on a major highway here is like the Autobahn.

  • Zorque@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Two car lengths? You absolute madman! That’s positively grotesque!

    For the purposes of this comment, I’m assuming that cars are about fifty feet long.