• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It would’ve been a great transition from fossil fuel, had we embraced it before EV tech was consumer ready. Now it’s just a step backward.

    • rbesfe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Hydrogen was never and will never be a viable and efficient transportation fuel

      • Troy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Special exception maybe for aviation and rocketry. But even then, methane (if made using green energy and the Sebatier process).

        • huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You can get comparable isp with methalox engines without any of the weight required to keep the hydrogen inside the rocket, right?

          • Troy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Hydrogen ISP is still king by a significant margin, but ISP isn’t the whole story – hydrogen comes with additional tank weight (due to lower density) and storage issues (pesky molecular size…). So that trade-off for ISP only really makes sense for an upper stage like Centaur. I’m not sure it makes sense for New Shepherd even…

      • CluckN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Pshh you haven’t seen the peaks of blimp technology. On May 6th when they launch the Hindenburg we’ll see who gets the last laugh.