- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
2 or 3, depends on whether the spider wants to wear high waist or low waist pants.
I prefer to see 1. But logic would be a 2 imo
As an arachnaphobe, somehow makes them much more tolerable
I feel like we need c/humansdrawingspiders.
More pantsbrained trouserganda. Where does the madness end?
Pants are the shackles of the patriarchy
how would HE wear ITS pants
Well, I’m French so to me every spider is a she!
Funny, I call them Greg.
Back four legs and bottom half of the butt covered
if the illustrations were drawn correctly, the response would be 1
Quelqu’un avait déjà fait cette remarque dans le post d’origine. Je n’en attendais pas moins de [email protected]
Yeah, but it should be the 4 back legs, not just the 2
Equal hands and feet
The first two ones won’t work because spider legs don’t attach at the abdomen.
Should we try with a dress then?
I have never imagined that before. So thanks for that.
I dunno why but this gives me generic dad vibes lol
I think we can all agree that three is absolute collyswaddle and should be discounted going forward.
Maybe but you will have to explain me what collyswaddle means first.
But… why?
Why not?
I see spiders more in the long and colourful stockings department.
You convinced me just by mentioning it. I see stripes!
I see stripes!
Absolutely. :)
