• Classy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Maybe I’m just screaming into the void here, but does it seem like, as a person who is still relatively out of touch with linux, I don’t necessarily have to update my Arch distribution whenever there are new updates available? I could theoretically just go on downloading new programs, uninstalling old ones, using everything as it sits until theoretically something breaks?

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I don’t necessarily have to update my Arch distribution whenever there are new updates available

      Clearly, op agrees

  • ozoned@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    And they were never heard from AGAIN! Oooooooo It is horror month, and that’s pretty scary! :-D

  • helaslo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    And that is why I use Opensuse tumbleweed, no worries ever (zypper takes a snapshot before and after each upgrade, single command to roll back)

  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Side note: “I’mma” is a contraction of the whole phrase “I’m going to” or “I’m about to” so it’s followed immediately by the verb indicating what you’ll be doing:

    “I’mma rawdog this sucker without backups.”

    Yes, I added sucker, because it’s going to suck up all your time and data, sucka!

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    It’s my experience that Ubuntu and Fedora break if you don’t upgrade often (and then suddenly do after a year), while arch doesn’t… Which is interesting, since it’s supposed to be the other way around…

    I think it’s because Fedora and Ubuntu add a lot of new things, while arch just updates it’s packages.

    • bitwolf@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Fedora upgrades are very reliable. I’ve never had one fail, 24 upgrades and counting.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Eh, I leave fedora for a while and come back and it’s fine. Never had it break and I’ve been using it consistently since like 27.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      More please. Getting ready to switch from Windows to Linux, been making sure I can install all the -arr I want and get games running, but in Mint.

      Now I’m hitting the brakes hard. It’s Arch if that means I don’t have this headache. I’ll need to start over learning, but it’ll be worth it.

      • punkfungus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’ve had two different arch based distros have issues when trying to update after long periods. I also had an Ubuntu server fail completely when doing a major version upgrade and had to restore it from backup. But then again I’ve also had no trouble updating an Ubuntu machine that was a couple years behind.

        I’m on Fedora now for my desktop and it’s been great so far, but I also do updates at least weekly. My advice would be if you expect to go months between updates your best choice is probably Debian.

      • DesolateMood@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        As long as you update frequently (I do it whenever I think about it, usually once every few days to a week) you shouldn’t run into any issues

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I’ve updated an Arch install after not being used for 2 years. I don’t think there were any issues.

    I’ve experienced far more issues upgrading to a new major release of an apt based distro though…

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That apt based distro was Ubuntu, wasn’t it?
      I never successfully upgraded that from one release to the next.

  • Luci
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s been an hour, I think OP didn’t make it!!!