• takeheart@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 months ago

    I initially wrote ‘temptor’ in the title but then double checked. Not today, Titivillus.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Those medieval people were silly and backward. Why would anyone think a demon would drag them to hell just because the mispeeled a

    • LillyPip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh no. Now we’ll never hear from FlyingSquid again. RIP, fiend, we’ll mis

    • takeheart@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      You wouldn’t think how far clerical errors could go when it was laboriously copied by hand by exhausted monks in candlelight.

      The whole Mary was a virgin thing (aka immaculate conception) was started because someone mistranslated young woman as (sexual) virgin. In some languages those terms are really close (even today for example in German: junge Frau Vs Jungfrau).

  • ummthatguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    Based on sheer numbers and the inclusion of “internet speak”, that must be one well fed and powerful demon.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yes, once the internet became popular I imagine he became powerful enough to overthrow Lucifer and take over Hell. There’s a place there where the smallest detail of what you write or say is nitpicked. It’s hell for people who aren’t good at grammar and spelling and heaven for grammar nazis.

    • takeheart@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      To be fair some languages like English or French have so horrendous and outdated orthography that I’m not going to fault the writers.

      Writers. Why is there even a W in that word still? Ridiculous, write?

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s what you think. He thrives on British English, so every time MS Word autocorrects colour to color or aluminium to aluminum, he is further sustained.

      • ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        why did they stop at “aluminum”? why don’t they have “magnesum”, “barum”, or “radum”?

        why don’t nfl games take place in a “stadum”? why is the size between small and large not a “medum”?

        either their table salt ahould contain sodum or their treatment of aluminium is so dumb.

        • Stovetop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 months ago

          I guess ask the Romans about half of those.

          The last time I saw a TIL about this sort of thing though it turned out that “Aluminum” was the original but some academics thought “Aluminium” sounded fancier. My understanding is that it relates to the oxide names, which in the case of aluminum is alumina, after which the -a is swapped for the -um, similar to how magnesium oxide is magnesia. But I’m too lazy to fact check.

          Also Molybdenum exists too, so it’s not like Aluminum would be the one exception that is just -um and not -ium.

  • TechLauren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    If it eats the mistakes wouldn’t that be helping? I’ll take the thing if no one else wants it.

  • Lexam
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wondar wat he’s up to these daze.

  • Akasazh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s rather ironic that his name is spelled ‘Tytinillus’ in the document of John the blind.

    • takeheart@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      There was some degree of standardization. Especially for important legal and religious texts alteration, even if accidental, was considered a sin/vice.

      Scribes very often simply had to produce 1:1 copies of existing texts. So the standard was right in front of them.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    You’ve got Paul Bunyan and John Henry, but I’ve never heard a tall tale about a scribe or a printer.

  • egrets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    How was there a demon of misspelling before standardized spelling?

    • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you read the article you would have seen that when it was first made up it was more about going to church and singing or praying out of rote and not doing it full heartedly.