• MindTraveller
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The third sentence makes it clear it’s fake

    • Geiger counters aren’t rhythmic, they’re random
    • How would the audience know the beat matches the counter?
    • Random music doesn’t sound good, the audience would be more excited for good music

    Disappointed in the people who believed this.

    • i_love_FFT@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Well… This is jazz… I’m skeptic as well, but what if it was some sort of experimental modern jazz where the musicians would try to predict the next click?

      • MindTraveller
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You can’t predict the next click, that’s what random means. This would never have gotten far enough to appear in front of an audience. They would have tried it at rehearsal and realised it was impossible.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It does have a rate though. Each click is random, but overall they’re at a predictable rate. Still, it wouldn’t be useful for music really. I could see someone trying to make it happen though. I’ve heard of dumber things.

          • MindTraveller
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 minutes ago

            Well in that case all you’ve done is reinvent tempo but worse. Unless you vary the rate on the fly, which requires moving the counter and/or radioactive material on the fly. And then all you’ve done is create a very bad musical instrument.