• stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Could have shortened the title significantly, and reuse it daily.

    “Trump speaks, experts say that’s ridiculous”

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 months ago

    There already is one. There are aound 100 Patriot missile batteries in the US. As usual Trump knows nothing about the subject he talks about.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        People in red states need jobs, it’s a welfare program.

        Also, billionaires get richer and can own colonies, but don’t look behind the curtain.

  • ILikeBoobies
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    You mean NORAD missile defence system?

    The point of putting it around Canada was so missiles would be shot down over it instead of the US

    • tracker@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You are so wrong… the most direct route for a missile attack to US from Russia passes over Canada, hence the location.

      • ILikeBoobies
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        They could still put it along the US border but it doesn’t make sense for the US to shoot missiles down on top of themselves

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 months ago

          That’s such a stupid take. They put it as far north as possible so they could get as much notice as possible. Even today it takes time to respond and you need as much as you can get. Even today, shooting down a ballistic missile at high hypersonic speeds with multiple warheads is much easier the earlier in flight you can shoot

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            That is pretty much exactly what they were saying. They put it as far north as possible, so the missiles would be fired upon as far north as possible, which means they would be shot down as far north as possible, and as far away from their targets as possible.

            You’re saying almost exactly the same thing as they did, and arguing that they were stupid for saying it.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t know why you’re being downvoted. You’re saying the same thing as the other guy who replied to you.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Maybe if they start launching immigrants across the border with trebuchets ….

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I guess we need to set up trapeze nets north of the border. We need those immigrants. They pick our crops.

          That would be a heck of a commute. I hope abuela’s heart is ok.

      • ILikeBoobies
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not really different at all, the iron done is just much newer/advanced tech

        • aidan@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          And you know, far more dense- which is the core of what makes it effective

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can build that for him for a cool 250 billion. I’m willing to guarantee 0% penetration of short range rockets launched by Hezbollah from anywhere in Lebanon.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    To protect us from whom? I thought his love affairs with Putin and Kim Jong would protect us from anyone that might want to attack the US?

  • m-p{3}A
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s to keep us pesky Canadians from trebuchet-ing poutine over the border.

  • Blackout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 months ago

    About time! We in Michigan are tired of the moose raids from Canada. They swim across our half of the lake and eat up our maple syrup.

  • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Pretty sure we have multiple anti missile systems deployed already.

    Also, who’s shooting missiles at America right now?

    I mean, other than North Korea, but that’s like a 10 year old with a water rocket trying to blow up the school from across town.

  • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Doesnt america already have one??? Also in the current geopolitical environment this may not be the worst idea ever…

  • Rhoeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Trump wants a lot of stupid shit. In the interest of national security, he should not under any circumstances be given any of it.

    And this man is potentially going to be elected to run a country.