• Arkouda
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I think you are missing the real question here. How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      See before; “you can’t address anything you’ve even said yourself when I actually answer you, but you still have this obsession over ‘getting the last word’.”

      You just have to reply, but you can’t address anything, despite last time anally listing “questions I haven’t answered.” Like I’ve said, I’ve answered you several times. And like you said, people can just scroll to the start of the thread and read it. So I don’t know what the fuck you’re doing by being this childish.

      • Arkouda
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You just have to reply, but you can’t address anything

        Pot calling the kettle black much?

        Nothing is stopping you from not replying.

        • Dasus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          37 minutes ago

          I like using forums and discussing even with people who are obnoxious and wrong. I don’t feel a need to stop replying. I don’t have a childish need of “winning” a “not-debate” I’m in.

          I’m not the one who loudly proclaimed they’re “done” with this debate. Or was it conversation? Your use of “fallacy!” while trying to “win” a debate seemed to imply you’re trying to debate, as did the list form of replying you did in your last comment.

          I answered all your questions, but I know you won’t address my answers or answer my questions.