Seriously I’ve seen a guy see a bunch of pixels and go “Idk but that reminds me of Mexico” and he was right. There’s no way the three letter companies wouldn’t want that kind of skillset, right?

  • Trailblazing Braille Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Not to pile on here, but this is not an instance of the birthday problem.

    The birthday problem would kick in if we asked “what are the chances that any two of these N people know the same place, whatever it may be.”

    But instead we’re discussing “what are the chances that one of these N people recognizes a specific place P.”

    Edit: maybe I’ve missed your point actually — were you saying that there are many details in one image, and the chances of some player recognizing one of those details is an instance of the birthday problem?

    • Deestan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      there are many details in one image, and the chances of some player recognizing one of those details is an instance of the birthday problem?

      That would be a valid model. But you are still right that it doesn’t apply: It would give the effect that a different geoguesser would get the picture right every test, while we are seeing consistent results from the top geoguessers.