IDF: Whoops, tee hee.

  • kingshrubb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Terrorism is bad and we should condemn it. Unless it’s done by the United States in which case we should call it “anti -communism or defending democracy”. Or if it’s done by Israel we can call it “self-defense”.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Whatever Israel is doing can just be added to the United States. In the end, Israel is just the guard dog “defending democracy” in the Middle East. A somewhat rabid guard dog, but still owned and fed by the US.

  • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    kill individual fighters

    They killed like 1 fighter in exchange for wounding a thousand civilians, including at least one little girl who died. The pager shit is every bit as indiscriminate as the bombing.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      i think they killed like, 12 people, and injured somewhere between 1-2 thousand more, probably some civilians in there, but these are military pagers to my knowledge so it’d be weird for it to hurt a bunch of random people, but it’s possible.

      if you include the radio attack i think it’s like another 40 dead, and like 500 injured? Don’t quote me on it.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        these are military pagers

        They were a shipment for general consumption that went to a dealer near the Iranian embassy.

        The target was the Iranian ambassador to Lebanon, and virtually everyone else was just collateral damage.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Hezbollah is a political party with 18 parliamentary seats and thousands of public service workers on their payroll.

          Saying these were “fighters” is akin to bombing an UNRWA center and claiming you killed 31 Hamas Terrorists.

      • sudo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Hezbollah was using commercial grade pagers because they’re a militia. The purpose of pagers are to contact them when their off duty. Many of these pagers blew up in homes, grocery stores, and other public places. Many civilians were killed and most people injured were bystanders.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          1 day ago

          from what i can recall, and from the stats i’ve seen, these “explosions” seem more like “really bad pocket fires” more than anything to me, i could see it injuring people. Maybe two or three standing immediately nearby other people.

          But considering this attack has only like 12 confirmed dead civilians or something, “many” seems a little excessive. I could see a few hundred getting injured though. Possibly a few cars/homes burning down. That might cause a few more.

          ok so, did a bit of a check here, 12 civilians died. That’s where that number came from. 40 people died total, i think. At least that’s what wikipedia tells me. I don’t think it ever mentions how many civilians were injured directly, but assuming it follows the deaths, it’s somewhere between probably 500 and 1000 i would guess.

          • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            from what i can recall, and from the stats i’ve seen,

            From what you can recall? I’m sorry, but I watched some of those videos, and I will not forget them. I cannot imagine what it must have been like to just be shopping in a supermarket when the person next to you has their legs suddenly blown off 3 feet from you.

            It’s terrorism, plain and simple.

            only 12 civilians

            Yeah dude. “Only.”’ You’re right though, I guess Israel really has raised the bar when it comes to indiscriminate murder of civilians. Those are rookie numbers.

            • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Yeah dude. “Only.”’ You’re right though, I guess Israel really has raised the bar when it comes to indiscriminate murder of civilians. Those are rookie numbers.

              When your enemy disperses themselves among the civilian population?

              This killed way less civilians than a traditional bombing that would have got the same Hezbollah fighters would have.

              • ad_on_is@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                It’s funny how Israel made it a “normal” thing, to use firearms and explosives around civilians for the purpose of getting rid of, what they call, bad guys.

                Imagine mass-shooting in a public school where a kid tries to hunt down other kids who bullied him for the past few years. Oh wait…

              • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 hours ago

                When your enemy disperses themselves among the civilian population?

                Obviously, bomb the grocery stores and the shopping malls, then blame the people you were targeting for the collateral murder.

                FFS, I’m old enough to remember when Obama drone striking a teenage boy was considered at least mildly controversial for liberals. Now cluster bombing a flea market is the new gold standard for Ethical Warfare.

    • WhyFlip@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      10 hours ago

      No, it’s not. This was a very tactical way of striking an enemy that hides behind women and children.

      • Elwynn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        So would Netanyahu also be considered as hiding behind women and children? He’s out in public, traveling and lives in Tel Aviv.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        This was a very tactical

        Flinging a hand grenade into a crowd several thousand times over

        But it’s okay because the crowd was full of Arabs aka Terrorists

        • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          There’s a big difference between dropping bombs and small pagers exploding. I watched a lot of those videos, and almost no one except the targets were injured.

          It’s really sad that anyone else got injured at all, but damn, I’m glad they were able to be so destructive without injuring the thousands upon thousands that have been dying up until now. Or are you just upset that you can’t claim genocide for this attack?

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Can you confidently say you know the exact chain of custody of your cell phone?

        Some killer gets a pager he doesn’t need, sells it to someone to make some cash, who gives it to their kid. Annnnd boom.

        • lemmycdatass@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          No. Can you? How does OP know this about 1000 civilians? Don’t get me wrong. Fuck the Israeli government and it’s indiscriminate murder, but also fuck the lies. Speak truth.

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Since you’re changing topics from “how could kids get pagers meant for someone else”…

            In war, everyone lies. But one thing I’ve found as an American is that, if you’re killing in another country, you’re probably the worse of the two.

      • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Hezbollah isn’t just a military organization. It’s a political party. The majority of those pagers were in civilian hands when they detonated.

    • BigPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Didn’t have precision munitions back then. Didn’t have drones that can monitor the battlefield from across the globe and provide real-time video feeds.

      Besides, in this case, Israel is playing Germany’s role.

      • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        9 hours ago

        so wrong on so many levels. but maybe we should ask the lgbtq spokesperson of hamas. ah, shit…there aint one because…

        • Elwynn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I’m trans. Doesn’t mean I want everyone who dislikes me to die. Wtf kind of twisted logic is that?

          • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            no it means the previous argument was bullshit because fights for human rights for people who fight against human rights is retarded beyond belief. wtf of twisted logic to support the killer as long as you are not getting killed. geez, you are sick.

            • Elwynn@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I think I somewhat misunderstood you previous argument. As the original argument of the post-chain was the comparison of the Allies carpetbombing Germany (resulting in civilian casualties), and the attacks by Israel (which has also resulted in civilian casualties). I understood your post as justifying the civilian casualties behind their beliefs.

              While I do not agree with your thought that people who fight against human-rights have their rights revoked. I can at least to some degree understand your point of view. It is my opinion murder should be an absolute last resort, and only in cases where a crime has been committed and no other options are available.

              On the point of civilian deaths resulting from any attack (be it the Allies, Israel, Hamas or other). I don’t find it acceptable in any way. And that is why I used the words “twisted logic”. I understood your stance as anyone who thinks differently regarding LGBTQ-rights regardless of any crimes commited should be killed. Which I harshly disagree with.

            • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              But you’re literally supporting a killer as long as you’re not getting killed??? Can you not see the irony?

              • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                dont you understand selfdefense, right and wrong? did you go to school…like ever? hamas and hizbulla want to eradicate israel. theres not much to discuss.

                • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Yes, I went to school where we learned history. WHY do Hamas and Hezbola want to eradicate israel? What about the civilians? Do you know what self defense is? Do you see how silly an argument it is when “their side” says the same thing about their actions?

          • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            so they are distancing themselves fro hamas, even start attacks against the hamas terrorists? i havent heard of that. so they have the right to make cover for terrorism against israel? fuck anyone who ever supported Hamas or Hizbullah as much as fuck anyone who supported hitler or stalin etc.

            • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Also, I want you to try this thought expect. Picture yourself in Gaza, for generations, one side has been negatively affecting your way of life. Imposing checkpoints, treating you like less than human. That side has now destroyed your schools, and hospitals, and mosques, family, and everything you hold dear. The otherside, while still horrible, generally leaves you alone to live your life. Why would you fight the side that generally leaves you be? Why would you not look at the other side as an enemy? This division is by design.

              • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                also i want you to try this thought experiment: you are german, all your folks killed jews, roma, sinta, red heads etc and the population just keeps on supporting the cause. and at some point the rest of the world is done with their shit and carpet bomb them. btw i am german. and we still have way to many nazis here.

                • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Ah, ok so genocide all around then. That’s sounds an awful lot like a final solution to your problem to me

            • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Cool, what about the people that support the innocent civilians? Because that’s who I support. Ya know the ones who don’t deserve it? Like the innocent people in Gaza, or the west Bank, or Lebanon, or Israel. What about them?

                • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Yes, the huge population of noncombattant Germans on the beaches on d-day, how could I forget that segment. Oh wait! Hitler had armies there, how silly of you.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Who’s confused? They wanted to do a genocide so now they’re doing a genocide.

  • capital@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Is lemmy having trouble telling the difference between Hamas and Hezbollah now?

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      No? This is implying that Israel has had the technology to precisely target people for months but chooses to destroy a whole region instead went it came to Palestine.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        to be clear, you can’t directly target an individual, you can maybe potentially target a single individual.

        This is also not to mention the cost and accessibility of doing something like this at scale. It’s theorized they either got into the factories, or somehow got through the shipment and intercepted it to do this operation.

        It’s possible they acted as a middleman but that would be really really hard to do at scale like this.

        And even if they did this in palestine, it would only work once.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          The cost? You mean these bombs are more expensive that the weapons used to level Gaza? The ones they only get because other countries sell them?

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Why would it only work once? It literally just worked twice in Lebanon. Lebanon is a sovereign nation that is not completely under the oppressive rule of a colonial occupier like Gaza is.

          Israel controls everything and everyone that enters and exits Gaza. If they can do it in Lebanon, they can do it in Gaza.

        • CoffeeJunkie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          24 hours ago

          You don’t need to speculate or theorize; they say exactly how they did it. I cut to the exact part of the video where it is succinctly explained.

          You’ll also notice that, according to Ben/according to Israel/according to Hezbollah… they advertised that they were going to stop using phones & switch to pagers. In July. So people going on about “they could have done this all along” are wrong. It’s been since sometime in July. This July. Which makes this a very fast & even more effective military operation.

          Yes, the shell company was set up 1.5 years ago. Date of sale, idk. But common sense: you need to sell your enemy the goods…and you need to know with relative certainty that the hardware is actively in use. So: since July.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          So they can do it to a sovereign nation, but they cannot do it to the completely oppressed population living in territories that they have complete control over, including every person and item that enters and exits? OK.

          Do you just not know what the reality in Gaza is like? Do you not understand the level of control that Israel has exerted on those people for the past 8+ decades?

          There is a reason that nobody can get humanitarian aide to them.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          I mean they have the method and the will to use it, that’s all I’m saying. Why couldn’t they intercept the phones and other devices used by Hamas leaders the same way?

          • capital@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 day ago

            I mean they have the method and the will to use it, that’s all I’m saying.

            The method may not have been applicable for some reason. Shooting people in the head is a method but unless they line up for you away from everyone who’s not Hamas, that’s not a realistic method to employ.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              for some reason

              Oh ok, super convincing argument. I refer to my previous response regarding the amount of control Israel exerts on Gaza. The suggestion that they could not do something similar there is absurd.

              • capital@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Oops, you missed this part (I’m sure it was an accident)

                may not have been applicable for some reason

                The comments I’m replying to are absolutely sure what Israel could have done. Mine make it clear I don’t know what Israel knows.

                The burden of proof is on those who seem to think they just need whatever information is on the public internet to know what would or wouldn’t work against various targets.

                Consider dialing back the confidence seeing as no one here knows shit about what intel any groups involved has.

            • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              Agreed! It’s SAFER to just Bomb Orphanages and Schools to ENSURE those Hamas Kids die instead of using your Military Knowledge you Obviously have to find a Way to target ONLY Hamas!

  • npz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    172
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well they’re still blowing up kids with these things so idk if it’s the most brilliant targeting technique

    • Nyanix
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      When your goal is genocide, a kill is a kill

    • Vent@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      97
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Compared to dumping white phosphorus over hospitals and refugee camps, killing 2 (?) children during an attack that targeted hundreds/thousands is many orders of magnitude more precise. I hate dead innocents as much as anyone, but you gotta admit the pagers were effective and included way less collateral damage than the methods Isreal has employed in recent history.

      The point of the post isn’t to praise the pagers attack. It’s to point out that Isreal is capable of causing less collateral damage in Gaza but chooses not to.

      • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s to point out that Isreal is capable of causing less collateral damage in Gaza but chooses not to.

        That comes down to how often Hamas orders things that can reasonably have small bombs put inside them on a large scale and that Hamas are expected to have on their person’s most of the time, how secure their supply lines are, how paranoid they are about looking for that kind of thing, that sort of thing. It involves a lot more moving parts and rare opportunities than just dropping some bombs.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Fucking weird comment.

        but you gotta admit the pagers were effective and included way less collateral damage than the methods Isreal has employed in recent history.

        Yeah. No I don’t.

      • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        but you gotta admit the pagers were effective and included way less collateral damage than the methods Isreal has employed in recent history.

        Do you admit that mass gas chambers are an effective way to kill people ?

        • Vent@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Yes. A very large part of what made the holocaust so terrible was that it was very effective at killing people.

        • azulavoir@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          If my goal was to kill exclusively enemy combatants and leave all civilians alone, it would be pretty effective to round them up and gas them, yes. I’d rather do that than indiscriminate fire.

          • bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Combatants tend to violently fight back, when you try to round them up. They also tend to hide among civilians in case of terrorist militia like Hezbollah.

      • Hlodwig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        74
        ·
        2 days ago

        You do realise targets in Gaza and targets in Lebanon are not the same? On one hand you have fighters shielding themselves behind civilians and dont even know what a pager is and why they would use it, on the other hand you have political and operative leaders on these fighters that need these pagers to stay low profile and untaped…

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            1 day ago

            The practice is said to be so routine that Israeli soldiers have a name for the human shields, who are referred to as shawish – informal slang for a low-ranking soldier – and the process was described by several witnesses.

            Palestinian civilians, mostly young men, are picked up by Israeli soldiers, dressed in Israeli army uniforms, then sent into tunnels and damaged houses ahead of Israeli forces, soldiers told Haaretz and Breaking the Silence.

            Their hands are tied together and a camera is attached to their bodies as they go in.

            Holy fuck that’s disgusting

            • ABCDE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              36
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Please give us a rundown of when human shields are okay and not okay. Let me guess, it depends who is using them, but in a roundabout way?

              • azulavoir@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                It’s pretty effective when your attacker doesn’t want to harm innocents at any cost, at least. But most organizations going to war don’t care enough.

              • Hlodwig@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                33
                ·
                1 day ago

                Bruh… Hamas put these traps in the middle of their “citizens”, do you think IDF forced them to do this tactic?

              • Hlodwig@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                31
                ·
                1 day ago

                Bruh… Hamas put these traps in the middle of their “citizens”, do you think IDF forced them to do this tactic?

            • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              29
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Ah so using human shields is OK all of a sudden? What about the second example? Don’t worry, I can find more if you like

              • Hlodwig@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                27
                ·
                1 day ago

                Bruh… Hamas put these traps in the middle of their “citizens”, do you think IDF forced them to do this tactic?

                • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  16
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I’m confused why you were so outraged by the use of human shields at first and now when I send examples you all of a sudden don’t seem to care. You didn’t even mention the second example yet.

        • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          That’s not really true unless you believe IDF propaganda

          Security

          Israel does justify the settlements and military bases in the West Bank in the name of Security. However, the reality of the settlements on-the-ground has been the cause of violent resistance and a significant obstacle to peace, as it has been for decades.

          This type of settlement, where the native population gets ‘Transferred’ to make room for the settlers, is a long standing practice. See: The Concept of Transfer 1882-1948, the Transfer Committee, and the JNF which led to Forced Displacement of 100,000 Palestinians throughout the mandate, before the mass ethnic cleansing campaign of 1948: Plan Dalet, Declassified Massacres of 1948, and Details of Plan C (May 1946) and Plan D (March 1948) . Further, declassified Israeli documents show that the Occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip were deliberately planned before being executed in 1967: Haaretz, Forward; while the peace process was exploited to continue de-facto annexation of the West Bank via Settlements (Oslo Accord Sources: MEE, NYT, Haaretz, AJ). The settlements are maintained through a violent apartheid that routinely employs violence towards Palestinians and denies human rights like water access, civil rights, etc. This kind of control gives rise to violent resistance to the Apartheid occupation, jeopardizing the safety of Israeli civilians.

          The settlements represent land-grabbing, and land-grabbing and peace-making don’t go together, it is one or the other. By its actions, if not always in its rhetoric, Israel has opted for land-grabbing and as we speak Israel is expanding settlements. So, Israel has been systematically destroying the basis for a viable Palestinian state and this is the declared objective of the Likud and Netanyahu who used to pretend to accept a two-state solution. In the lead up to the last election, he said there will be no Palestinian state on his watch. The expansion of settlements and the wall mean that there cannot be a viable Palestinian state with territorial contiguity. The most that the Palestinians can hope for is Bantustans, a series of enclaves surrounded by Israeli settlements and Israeli military bases.

          • Avi Shlaim

          How Avi Shlaim moved from two-state solution to one-state solution

          ‘One state is a game changer’: A conversation with Ilan Pappe

          State violence – official and otherwise – is part and parcel of Israel’s apartheid regime, which aims to create a Jewish-only space between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea. The regime treats land as a resource designed to serve the Jewish public, and accordingly uses it almost exclusively to develop and expand existing Jewish residential communities and to build new ones. At the same time, the regime fragments Palestinian space, dispossesses Palestinians of their land and relegates them to living in small, over-populated enclaves.

          The apartheid regime is based on organized, systemic violence against Palestinians, which is carried out by numerous agents: the government, the military, the Civil Administration, the Supreme Court, the Israel Police, the Israel Security Agency, the Israel Prison Service, the Israel Nature and Parks Authority, and others. Settlers are another item on this list, and the state incorporates their violence into its own official acts of violence. Settler violence sometimes precedes instances of official violence by Israeli authorities, and at other times is incorporated into them. Like state violence, settler violence is organized, institutionalized, well-equipped and implemented in order to achieve a defined strategic goal.

          Civilian Deaths and Human Shields:

          Israel does deliberately targets civilian areas. From in general with the Dahiya Doctrine to multiple systems deployed in Gaza to do so: ‘A mass assassination factory’: Inside Israel’s calculated bombing of Gaza, Lavender, and Where’s Daddy. When it comes to Israeli Soldiers and Civilians, there is also the use of the Hannibal Directive, which was also used on Oct 7th.

          Hundreds of Genocide Scholars have described this ethnic cleansing campaign as genocide because of the deliberate targeting of children/civilians and expressed intent by Israeli officials: “A Textbook Case of Genocide”: Israeli Holocaust Scholar Raz Segal Decries Israel’s Assault on Gaza, 800+ Legal Scholars Say Israel May Be Perpetrating ‘Crime of Genocide’ in Gaza , Law for Palestine Releases Database with 500+ Instances of Israeli Incitement to Genocide – Continuously Updated.

          On the subject of Human Shields, there are some independent reports for past conflicts of Hamas jeopardizing the safety of civilians via Rocket fire in dense urban areas, two instances during Oct 7th, but no independent verification since then so far. None of which absolve Israel of the crime of targeting civilians under international law:

          Intentionally utilizing the presence of civilians or other protected persons to render certain areas immune from military attack is prohibited under international law. Amnesty International was not able to establish whether or not the fighters’ presence in the camps was intended to shield themselves from military attacks. However, under international humanitarian law, even if one party uses “human shields”, or is otherwise unlawfully endangering civilians, this does not absolve the opposing party from complying with its obligations to distinguish between military objectives and civilians or civilian objects, to refrain from carrying out indiscriminate or disproportionate attacks, and to take all feasible precautions to spare civilians and civilian objects.

          Additionally, there is extensive independent verification of Israel using Palestinians as Human Shields: IDF uses Human Shields, including Children (2013 Report), and in the latest war Israel “Systematically” Uses Gaza Children as Human Shields, Rights Group Finds

            • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              Not all of Hezbollah are combatants, things are not that simple. Not all of Hezbollah are militants, there are many social workers and politicians. And even if they were, there are zero guarantees that all the pagers ended up in the hands of Hezbollah members. And even if that was the case, detonating them in public spaces is still a violation of international humanitarian law. By it’s nature this was a massive terrorism attack

              Quote

              Hezbollah organizes an extensive social development program and runs hospitals, news services, educational facilities, and encouragement of Nikah mut‘ah. Some of its established institutions are: Emdad committee for Islamic Charity, Hezbollah Central Press Office, Al Jarha Association, and Jihad Al Binaa Developmental Association. Jihad Al Binna’s Reconstruction Campaign is responsible for numerous economic and infrastructure development projects in Lebanon. Hezbollah has set up a Martyr’s Institute (Al-Shahid Social Association), which guarantees to provide living and education expenses for the families of fighters who die in battle.

              Hezbollah holds 14 of the 128 seats in the Parliament of Lebanon and is a member of the Resistance and Development Bloc. According to Daniel L. Byman, it is “the most powerful single political movement in Lebanon.” Hezbollah, along with the Amal Movement, represents most of Lebanese Shi’a.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s an Obama type technique. Sure, you might blow up a few innocents, but the rate of eliminated enemies vs killed innocents is better than in traditional warfare, so a numbers guy would always go for that one.

      • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Leaked official documents show that that wasn’t really the case as the public was led to believe

        Quotes

        The White House and Pentagon boast that the targeted killing program is precise and that civilian deaths are minimal. However, documents detailing a special operations campaign in northeastern Afghanistan, Operation Haymaker, show that between January 2012 and February 2013, U.S. special operations airstrikes killed more than 200 people. Of those, only 35 were the intended targets. During one five-month period of the operation, according to the documents, nearly 90 percent of the people killed in airstrikes were not the intended targets. In Yemen and Somalia, where the U.S. has far more limited intelligence capabilities to confirm the people killed are the intended targets, the equivalent ratios may well be much worse.

        The documents show that the military designated people it killed in targeted strikes as EKIA — “enemy killed in action” — even if they were not the intended targets of the strike. Unless evidence posthumously emerged to prove the males killed were not terrorists or “unlawful enemy combatants,” EKIA remained their designation, according to the source. That process, he said, “is insane. But we’ve made ourselves comfortable with that. The intelligence community, JSOC, the CIA, and everybody that helps support and prop up these programs, they’re comfortable with that idea.”

        The source described official U.S. government statements minimizing the number of civilian casualties inflicted by drone strikes as “exaggerating at best, if not outright lies.”

    • sudo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Its accepting Israeli propaganda to say that this was a precision strike. This is like using cluster munitions.

      Whenever Israel comes up with an idea for an assassination they do it because they can. Its a force of habit for them.

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    “we have infiltrate the supply chain of communication devices order by Hizbollah what should we do”

    • “put GPS tracker so we know where they are”
    • “we can listen to all their plans and communication”
    • “put a bomb inside …”
    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      to be fair, a gps tracker probably wouldn’t be very useful. You wouldn’t even know which pager is held by who. It would just tell you where people “probably are generally” which you probably already know.

      you could intercept communications, but they’re probably already doing that. doing it at a pager level would be weird, you should be doing it from a transmission level. But i don’t know how pagers work so don’t quote me on that.

      you could put a bomb inside of it. That’s an option…

    • MiDaBa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I am fully against this booby trapping war crime regime but the problem with your first options is that pagers don’t transmit like phones do. That means there would be no way to remotely aquire the GPS or other saved data undetected.

  • Zementid@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Hamas != Hisbollah

    But I start to wonder if they Knew about the planed attacks and let them happen to start this massacre.

    It feels like the all seeing eye of Mossad was ignored on purpose. I hope Netanjahus Name will be branded for ever. He deserves no good mention in History of humanity.

    On the other side… humanity faces the biggest historic event ever and no one cares (climate change)

      • Zementid@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I think you imply the wrong thing here. of course they probably do, but what is the core of your statement?

        Mine was:

        Netanjahu (Not all of Israel and definitely not all Jews) wants this genocide. He needs it for his own survival, to a point where he gladly accepted the rape-murder of Festival crowd… not any festival, a Hippie-Goa-Festival full of people who would never vote conservative, so a scapegoat the conservatives gladly gave.

        Conservatives globally are such a vomit inducing Subgenre of human scum. Hamas and Hisbollah ARE conservatives too… the liberal-green-peace-people have no representation in this world filled with hatred. Quite the opposite, they are vilified and killed.

  • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    It took them years to prepare that operation. It was against Hezbollah, not Hamas, because they saw them as the bigger threat.

    The war in Gazah is barbaric, but the sensible immediate alternative would have been a very targeted operation to find and rescue the hostages, not something like this.

    • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      And it required Hezbollah to have no concept of logistic security. Maybe Hamas is not as amateurish as Hezbollah in that regard.

      • sudo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Historically Hamas has been the amateurs and Hezbollah the pros. Hezbollah has actual victories against the IDF. Hamas’ military success last October was completely unprecedented. Its generally believed that Hezbollah trained Hamas into the fighting force it is now. And since Iran trained Hezbollah you get people claiming Hamas is an Iranian puppet.