• weew
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      food deemed too sad even for No Frills

      Lol

    • Showroom7561
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, but I’m sure there’s some tax benefit to calling it a food bank. #RecordProfits

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    France was a place and late 1700s was a time when peasants found a solution to this issue.

    Let them eat cake?

  • jerkface
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The pages of The Beaverton today, the Toronto Star tomorrow.

  • a9249
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    LET THEM EAT CAKE - Galen, probably.

  • Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I legitimately thought it was a foodbank that required proof of poorness somehow and charged a little above cost(don’t worry I hear Loblaws is also the supplier so they’ll just inflate the cost).

    My hopes are dashed upon the rocks such that seeing it was a Bearverton article sparked no joy in me.

  • Jupdown
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I laughed way too hard at this. God damn the Beaverton is just on fire these days…