“If somebody breaks into my house, they’re getting shot,” she said, laughing. “I probably should not have said that. My staff will deal with that later.”

  • trafficnab
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Shooting people isn’t a constitutionally enumerated right of the office of the president

    She’d have to order one of her executive employees to do it

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      According to SCOTUS, anything the President does could be immune to prosecution, including shooting someone, intruder or otherwise.

      • BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Not anything, it’s only shit the SCOTUS deems as “an official act”, so it can be open to interpretation based off the politics of the Supreme Court justices.

    • zephorah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I don’t think POTUS or VPOTUS, even pre SCOTUS insane decision on presidential immunity, would be prosecuted for standing ground or engaging would be castle law, even in a state without either. I don’t think any of those offices would be held to duty to retreat either, and rightly so.