• jerkface
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    2 months ago

    Thanks. Interesting thoughts.

    A) is an opinion and it was stated as an opinion, since the post served in place of the discussion that was skipped. I feel justified in sharing my opinion about the direction I want the community to take. I can’t force my views on anyone, and it seems amazingly insecure to respond to that with a unilateral de-mod.

    B) was a request for patience and discussion before people started de-modding each other. But okay, let’s call it “downplaying” for the sake of argument. I don’t see how such downplaying amounts to justification to de-mod me.

    C) I can’t respond to but I do find it rather uncharitable. If you can give an example, I’d appreciate that. And D) I can never assure someone who wishes to believe otherwise.

    When it comes down to it, it sounds like you are saying the other mod was justified in de-modding me because I voiced disagreement with his choices. Plus a bunch of other stuff about me just plain not deserving to be a mod for reasons I admit I don’t grasp; that I’m just intrinsically deserving of being de-modded. Have I got it?

    • AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      The only part of your biased, self-serving spin on everything I said which I agree with is the part where you said you are not deserving to be a mod.