Will it be effective?

Spoiler

No, it was not very effective.

EDIT: The banning event continues. Please consult the modlog to observe.

https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&modId=7121342

If you scroll down to about a day ago, you might be able to observe an emerging behavior from this mod.

EDIT 2: The mod in question moderates a total of 108 Lemmy communities. How deep does this conspiracy run? Is this mod a lost Redditor? More to come!

EDIT 3: The mod has now removed my comment all together, one might assume because it was still receiving upvotes in the 2 hours following my ban. Are there similarities here to Watergate? You be the judge!

EDIT 4: The mod in question has now been removed as a mod of the [email protected] community, as a result of their abuse of power.

https://lemmy.world/post/19731457

This was their response:

EDIT 5: This will be my final update, since as far as I see it, the issue this thread focuses on has been resolved. To quote Beaver herself in a very ironic comment she made directed towards someone else:

Clearly this was all just a case of…

  • MindTravellerEnglish
    94·
    3 months ago

    Users cannot vote in a community that has banned them. If the mod wants to restrict voting only to people who vote in good faith, that’s their prerogative. It’s probably a good idea, it prevents downvote spam from bots and the like. When you have a community that has very different values from /all, maybe kicking the /all people who vote against the sub’s values out is good. Voting is participation.

    • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.orgOPEnglish
      71·
      3 months ago

      Shining transparency on these values and modding decisions to the attention of the fediverse then serves the greater good.

      • MindTravellerEnglish
        51·
        3 months ago

        It does. You’ve opened the conversation about voting as participation and helped us reach some new ideas on moderation practice. It’s dialectics. As I said in another comment in this thread, I think the existence of posts like this is good even if this ban wasn’t a problem.

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      61·
      3 months ago

      When some of those mods are perfectly fine with lgbtq persecution, and make it out like vegans have it worse, or dont care because they wouldn’t have to see it personally…

      I’m just going to go ahead and consider it a toxic shithole. Worst part? Different mod, but they seem to be all over the same vegan communities, so none of them become worthwhile.

      I personally don’t care if they ban me since I’ve blocked the communities anyway. Just unfortunate as I really enjoy seeing some of the recipes, as there are a decent number of them that are gluten free (which I need to be).

      • MindTravellerEnglish
        31·
        3 months ago

        Which mod is queerphobic? Can I see the evidence?

        • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          3·
          3 months ago

          Well, spoke to soon. I was banned for being ‘uncivil’ on the .world vegan community for calling out this same behavior, and hoping the community ended up somewhere other than on that particular instance.

          Sooo… yeah I’m keeping the block. Maybe expanding to some mods there would be sensible.

          Edit: There, all set now.

        • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          3·
          3 months ago

          I’ll have to unblock, so I can do that later on, sure. Working so not paying much attention to Lemmy at the moment.

          Edit: Sorry, my mistake, not a mod. An admin on the instance recommended / linked to in the side bar.