It is on.

  • norimee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Now the MAGA people are mad that they can’t use their AI pictures anymore and pretend they are real.

    Sad MAGA face 😡

    • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Why are right wing parties obsessed with AI posters? And like HORRIFICALLY BAD AI posters? They’re creepy as hell. In my country too, it’s just unsettling. I guess it’s easier than a photoshoot and allows you to make any obscene shit you want… Or just straight up lie.

      • mutter9355@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think you already answered your own question there. GenAI makes it really easy to flood a platform with loads of bullshit, and as a consequence make any point seem (at least somewhat) believable

      • ArxCyberwolf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Doing it themselves would take both effort and creativity, as well as time. AI lets them vomit out tons ot nonsense with little effort.

  • abobla@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    lmao at the haters in the comments pretending they don’t know who she is

    • Blooper@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah I actually thought she wouldn’t ever officially do it unless it was being timed and pre planned to occur just after the debate in order to have maximum impact. Which - I would guess that it was. Not that it’s a bad thing.

      Anyway I didn’t think she would because I’m certain she lost some fans tonight - deciding to step into this race in such a major way. And the cynic in me thought she was more interested in money and wouldn’t risk her image. I’m glad I was wrong.

        • Blooper@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          36
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Wait she did? Wow I have a lot to learn about Taylor Swift. Okay I would have definitely deserved to lose that bet.

      • rusticus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        3 months ago

        She endorsed Biden in 2020. There are no fans that didn’t understand her political leanings.

      • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah I actually thought she wouldn’t ever officially do it unless it was being timed and pre planned to occur just after the debate in order to have maximum impact.

        After the AI image ordeal she released a statement saying “for the safety of her fans” and being mid-tour she wouldn’t release a statement until after he tour ended…which coincidentally was after the election.

        Maybe she got some blowback because that would be the coward’s way out (publicly denounce the orange turd if he lost, or just make it a minor, non-issue if he won), but also being more concerned with the $$ her tour makes by staying out of it.

        I’m glad she nutted up and chose a side in this and has some sway with her non-tween rapid fan base. It certainly won’t make me atart listening to her music though.

  • roofTophopper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Banking on the following comments from the right, which they use for every artist’s endorsement:

    They’re a has been washed up. Who even is this person? Guess I can cross him/her off my list I don’t even know who this person is, what does it matter? This won’t move the needle at all They should keep their options out of politics When is the last time this person has been relevant? Of course they would, all actors/actresses/artists are blue

    Spin the ol wheel and let’s see what we land on.

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      They should keep their options out of politics

      And the same people who said that are the ones who love kid rock or the other motor city nutball whose concerts are nothing but right wing bs

    • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I bet they’d also say if a pop star is influential on your political opinions, you’re a damn moron.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Twice… if you count Trump as a movie star.

          Reagan is somehow remembered for lowering taxes even, when taxes were actually higher for most people* when he left office.

          (*It was a little lower for corporations and the wealthy.)

        • Letsdothis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Well, I’m not sure cameo appearances qualify “movie star.”

          And maybe they wouldn’t be that insightful. Either way, it’s a silly notion. We certainly should put weight in the political opinions of pop stars. Queen Latifahs endorsement of Biden is what swayed my vote.

          Edit: So… Everyone agrees pop stars political opinions are important? It’s ok that Queen Latifahs swayed my vote?

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    I hate that this is what it takes to get some people to vote, but at least they’re going to vote. Hopefully.

  • twistypencil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I honestly didn’t understand the media timing. It seems like it would be more effective to wait until the bump from the debate was over, then do the swift bump to keep the beat

        • ulkesh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          It wasn’t the wrong link initially, I believe. I was watching the video on my television last night when it suddenly stopped and went private. I think MSNBC took it down and then put up a new one.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      When the most popular musician in the world, a woman who has a vast number of American followers, a woman who got thousands of them to register to vote this year just by saying so, endorses a candidate, it’s news.

    • abobla@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yeah, this news is so irrelevant that it gathered a lot of buthurt people to go on posts and videos about it to say how much they don’t care. Let’s be honest, it’s not that they don’t care, they are bothered by it, they are concerned and afraid.

      And right now this is the top post on lemmy. Very irrelevant, right?

  • distantsounds@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Finally. After the ai bs she should have stomped. But I suppose it’s hard to pass up the cash though Edit:sorry not sorry swifties

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      127
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      One of the most influential people currently alive endorsing a political candidate is absolutely news.

      • hOrni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        3 months ago

        And like what was she waiting for? Before the debate was she unsure?

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          3 months ago

          probably maximizing impact doing it when more people are talking about the two candidates. also avoids some potential criticism because she hadn’t released her policy plan until about right now. so now you got policies+debate+L+ratio

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s entirely possible she wasn’t going to endorse anyone until Trump started with the AI saying she endorsed him.

        • ???@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s because she’s rich bitch who wants to sell. No other reason.

          • ulkesh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I take it no one ever told you just how much of a dick you are.

            So I’ll help you out here — you’re a dick. You might want to see someone about that.

            Or don’t and continue being a dick on useless social media platforms where literally nothing matters just so you can feel smug and righteous within the confines of your inferiority complex.

      • hOrni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        45
        ·
        3 months ago

        I know she’s popular, but are people really gonna go “I was going to vote for Trump, but Taylor said I should vote for Camala, so that’s what I’ll do”?

        • Drunemeton@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          46
          ·
          3 months ago

          She stated that since someone on Truth Social posted an AI-generated image of her endorsing Trump she felt she must set the record straight.

          She wrote why she’s voting for Kamala. She then encouraged her fans to research the candidates and decide for themselves which one best represented their own viewpoints.

          I did like her reminder that if you’re a new voter you do need to register first!

          But at no point did she tell anyone who to vote for…

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’ve never like actually voted before but Taylor wouldn’t talk about it if it weren’t important

          Then they do their research (well they did, they read her post) and tap her story to get registered. She follows it up with another post around Election Day and they go vote.

          (No offense Swifties, just using one example. We can’t all be highly politically active, high-information citizens. Those who are will have gaps elsewhere in their lives instead.)

          • bufalo1973@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            3 months ago

            That “get registered” is one of the things I don’t understand why hasn’t been changed. In Spain you can vote the moment you are 18. No need to register anywhere. The only register that need to be updated is “where you live”, so you go vote to your nearest location.

            • poweruser@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              3 months ago

              One of our two parties wins more when more people vote.

              Therefore, the other party must oppose voting by the largest groups, such as young people and people who live in cities.

              The less popular party also has disproportionate control of government policy.

              Which is to say, they oppose democracy itself. It is only a question of degree

            • mkwt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Question, when you move to a new place in Spain, do you need to register residency with the police?

              I don’t know if Spain does that or not, but I think Italy does some version.

              The United States doesn’t have that, and doesn’t have a national id card. Although most people effectively register themselves to get a driver license, that is only required if you drive. So voter registration nominally provides some way for the government to get the information on residency, which is important for figuring out which local elections you need to vote in.

              Now recently, in the last couple of decades, some states started requiring photo id verification to vote. This defeats the purpose of having a separate voter registration system, because you still have to go to the driver registration system to get either a driver license, or a non-driving photo ID. Nevertheless, the separate voter registration system has hung around in every single one of these states, because the real goal is to prevent people from voting.